Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?

被引:11
|
作者
Alas, Alexandriah [1 ]
Chandrasekaran, Neeraja [2 ]
Devakumar, Hemikaa [2 ]
Martin, Laura [2 ]
Hurtado, Eric [2 ]
Davila, G. Willy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol, 7300 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Dept Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, 2950 Cleveland Clin Blvd, Weston, FL 33331 USA
关键词
Uterine prolapse; Advanced prolapse; Total vaginal hysterectomy; Pelvic organ prolapse; McCall culdoplasty; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION; VAULT PROLAPSE; SUSPENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-017-3436-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
There is a paucity of data on the success of vaginal surgery for severe prolapse. The authors hypothesized that the success rates of total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) with McCall culdoplasty in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and in women with less severe POP are similar. This was a retrospective review of women undergoing TVH with McCall culdoplasty from 2005 to 2014. Advanced POP was defined as exteriorized uterovaginal prolapse with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C, Ba or Bp 50% of the total vaginal length. The primary aim was to compare surgical success of TVH with McCall culdoplasty for the repair of advanced POP and less severe POP at 1 year. A total of 311 women were included, 38 with advanced POP and 273 with less severe POP. Women with advanced POP were older (71.6 vs. 61.8 years, respectively; p < 0.0001), but there were no significant differences in the length of follow-up (102.5 vs. 117 weeks, p = 0.2378), success rates (76.3% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.3553) or reoperation rates (2.6% vs. 4%, p > 0.9999) between women with advanced POP and less severe POP, respectively. There was a higher failure rate in the anterior compartment in those with advanced POP (18.4% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.0168), but not in the apical or posterior compartment. TVH with McCall culdoplasty is equally effective for the treatment of advanced uterovaginal prolapse as for the treatment of less severe POP. Surgeons should consider this traditional surgery for their patients even if they have high-stage uterovaginal prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 144
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study
    Federico Spelzini
    Matteo Frigerio
    Stefano Manodoro
    Maria Lieta Interdonato
    Maria Cristina Cesana
    Debora Verri
    Caterina Fumagalli
    Martina Sicuri
    Elena Nicoli
    Serena Polizzi
    Rodolfo Milani
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 65 - 71
  • [22] Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study
    Spelzini, Federico
    Frigerio, Matteo
    Manodoro, Stefano
    Interdonato, Maria Lieta
    Cesana, Maria Cristina
    Verri, Debora
    Fumagalli, Caterina
    Sicuri, Martina
    Nicoli, Elena
    Polizzi, Serena
    Milani, Rodolfo
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [23] Post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse
    Robinson, Dudley
    Thiagamoorthy, Gans
    Cardozo, Linda
    MATURITAS, 2018, 107 : 39 - 43
  • [24] Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention
    Schiavi, Michele Carlo
    Savone, Delia
    Di Mascio, Daniele
    Di Tucci, Chiara
    Perniola, Giorgia
    Zullo, Marzio Angelo
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 223 : 113 - 118
  • [25] Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study
    Rahmanou, Philip
    Price, Natalia
    Jackson, Simon R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (11) : 1687 - 1694
  • [26] Evidence-Based Review of Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Hoke, Tanya P.
    Tan-Kim, Jasmine
    Richter, Holly E.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2019, 74 (07) : 429 - 435
  • [27] Improved body image after uterovaginal prolapse surgery with or without hysterectomy
    Rogers, Rebecca G.
    Meyer, Isuzu
    Smith, Ariana L.
    Ackenbom, Mary
    Barden, Lindsey
    Korbly, Nicole
    Mazloomdoost, Donna
    Thomas, Sonia
    Nager, Charles
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [28] High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation Versus McCall's Culdoplasty for Vaginal Vault Suspension in Utero-Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
    Verma, Aruna
    Kashyap, Monika
    Gupta, Abhilasha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [29] Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse
    Wang, Kaiyue
    Shi, Lijuan
    Huang, Zheren
    Xu, Yun
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 26 (03) : 239 - 247
  • [30] Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse using validated questionnaires: 2-year prospective study
    Lone, Farah
    Curnow, Tamara
    Thomas, Sarah Anne
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (01) : 71 - 79