Adaptation and the poor: development, resilience and transition

被引:77
作者
Jerneck, Anne [2 ]
Olsson, Lennart [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Lund Univ Ctr Sustainabil Studies, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Econ Hist, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
adaptation; climate change; development; insurance; poverty alleviation; resilience; transition theory;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2007.0434
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Risk minimization is no longer a sufficient survival strategy for poor people in livelihood systems increasingly exposed to frequent extreme events. This calls for comprehensive adaptation to climate change. Within the climate change regime, adaptation is as central as mitigation but needs to be much more explicitly addressed at local, national and global levels. There is also a need for policy renewal in other international regimes that are central to adaptation, such as environment, human rights, development and trade. Accordingly, this article addresses poverty-relevant adaptation through the medium of three discourses: development, resilience, and transition theory. Development, as a post-war project of theories, strategies and policies, spells out the links between rich and poor countries and offers modernization trajectories but few solutions for adaptation and sustainability transitions. Resilience, as an analytical framework emerging in ecology in the 1970s in reaction to ideas of equilibrium, depicts incremental changes and capacity to preserve systems within given frames but does not recognize that social change mainly implies transitions to renewed forms of production, consumption and distribution with new combinations of organization, institutions and technology. Transition theory focuses on profound multilevel changes in complex (sub)systems, thereby offering a powerful framework for theorizing empirical findings and promoting adaptation as a transition to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Social and ecological resilience: are they related? [J].
Adger, WN .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) :347-364
[2]  
ANGEL MT, 2005, IND TRANSFORMATION D
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[4]  
[Anonymous], GLOB ENV OUTL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Development Theory: Deconstruction/Reconstruction
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SYNTHESIS REPORT, P1, DOI DOI 10.2134/JEQ2008.0015BR
[7]  
Armitage D, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[8]  
Bell D.R., 2004, RES PUBLICA-NETH, V10, P135, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESP.0000034638.18936.aa, DOI 10.1023/B:RESP.0000034638.18936.AA]
[9]  
BURNELL P, 2002, COMPANION DEV STUDIE, P473
[10]  
Burton Ian., 1993, The Environment as Hazard