Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon

被引:15
作者
Benndorf, Matthias [1 ]
Kotter, Elmar [1 ]
Langer, Mathias [1 ]
Herda, Christoph [2 ]
Wu, Yirong [3 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Radiol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Kantonsspital Graubunden, CH-7000 Chur, Switzerland
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Madison Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mammography; Bayesian analysis; Decision support techniques; BI-RADS; CAD; BREAST-CANCER RISK; DATA SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PREDICTION MODELS; CLINICAL-DATA; VARIABILITY; DESCRIPTORS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-014-3570-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To develop and validate a decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on a standardized descriptor terminology (BI-RADS lexicon) to reduce variability of practice. We used separate training data (1,276 lesions, 138 malignant) and validation data (1,177 lesions, 175 malignant). We created na < ve Bayes (NB) classifiers from the training data with tenfold cross-validation. Our "inclusive model" comprised BI-RADS categories, BI-RADS descriptors, and age as predictive variables; our "descriptor model" comprised BI-RADS descriptors and age. The resulting NB classifiers were applied to the validation data. We evaluated and compared classifier performance with ROC-analysis. In the training data, the inclusive model yields an AUC of 0.959; the descriptor model yields an AUC of 0.910 (P < 0.001). The inclusive model is superior to the clinical performance (BI-RADS categories alone, P < 0.001); the descriptor model performs similarly. When applied to the validation data, the inclusive model yields an AUC of 0.935; the descriptor model yields an AUC of 0.876 (P < 0.001). Again, the inclusive model is superior to the clinical performance (P < 0.001); the descriptor model performs similarly. We consider our classifier a step towards a more uniform interpretation of combinations of BI-RADS descriptors.
引用
收藏
页码:1768 / 1775
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BRE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071)
[5]   Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Floyd, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) :773-778
[6]   BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ON BI-RADS STANDARDIZED LEXICON [J].
BAKER, JA ;
KORNGUTH, PJ ;
LO, JY ;
WILLIFORD, ME ;
FLOYD, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) :817-822
[7]   BIRADS™ mammography:: Exercises [J].
Balleyguier, Corinne ;
Bidault, Francois ;
Mathieu, Marie Christine ;
Ayadi, Salma ;
Couanet, Dorninique ;
Sigal, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 61 (02) :195-201
[8]   Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? [J].
Berg, WA ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Jackson, VP ;
Bassett, LW ;
Beam, CA ;
Lewis, RS ;
Crewson, PE .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :871-880
[9]   Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment [J].
Berg, WA ;
Campassi, C ;
Langenberg, P ;
Sexton, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1769-1777
[10]  
Burnside Elizabeth S, 2009, J Am Coll Radiol, V6, P851, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.023