Oncological Long-term Outcome After Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer-21-yr Follow-up

被引:12
作者
Bruendl, Johannes [1 ]
Osberghaus, Vera [1 ]
Zeman, Florian [2 ]
Breyer, Johannes [1 ]
Ganzer, Roman [3 ]
Blana, Andreas [4 ]
Gierth, Michael [1 ]
Denzinger, Stefan [1 ]
Burger, Maximilian [1 ]
Rosenhammer, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Urol, Caritas St Josef Med Ctr, Landshuter Str 65, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Ctr Clin Studies, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Asklepios Hosp Bad Tolz, Dept Urol, Bad Tolz, Germany
[4] Furth Hosp, Dept Urol, Furth, Germany
关键词
High-intensity focused; ultrasound; Oncological outcome; Long term; Prostate cancer; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Owing to the morbidity of established radical treatment options for prostate cancer, alternative whole-gland and focal treatment strategies have emerged. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one of the most studied sources for tissue ablation and has been used since the 1990s. Objective: To provide 21-yr oncological long-term follow-up data of an unselected series of patients who underwent whole-gland HIFU for nonmetastatic prostYate cancer. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 674 patients were treated between November 1997 and November 2012 in one university center. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The oncological outcome was assessed by biopsy failure-free survival (BFFS), salvage treatment-free survival (STFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the prognostic relevance of clinical variables. Results and limitations: In total, 560 patients were included into the evaluation and the median follow-up was 15.1 yr, with a range up to 21.4 yr. At 15 yr, CSS rates for low-, intermediate-, and high risk patients were 95%, 89%, and 65%, respectively; MFS, STFS-1 (salvage treatment other than HIFU), STFS-2 (salvage treatment including repeat HIFU), and BFFS rates were 91%, 85%, and 58%; 77%, 63%, and 29%; 67%, 52%, and 28%; and 82%, 73%, and 47%, respectively. Preoperative high-risk category was an independent predictor of inferior OS, CSS, MFS, STFS, and BFFS. Conclusions: Although whole-gland HIFU achieved good long-term cancer control in low and intermediate-risk patients, high-risk patients should not be treated routinely by HIFU. Intermediate-risk patients achieve high CSS and MFS rates, but a relevant salvage treatment rate has to be reckoned with. Long-term data after whole-gland therapy might help derive implications for focal treatment sources and patient selection. Patient summary: Long-term data after whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy are crucial to prove its oncological efficacy, and may help derive implications for focal treatment strategies and patient selection. In this context, whole-gland HIFU achieved good long-term cancer control up to 21 yr in low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Owing to considerably inferior long-term cancer control, it should not routinely be used in high-risk PCa patients. (C) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 140
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer-29-Year Follow-up [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Taari, Kimmo ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Andren, Ove ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (24) :2319-2329
[2]   High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: comparative definitions of biochemical failure [J].
Blana, Andreas ;
Brown, Stephen C. W. ;
Chaussy, Christian ;
Conti, Giario N. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Ganzer, Roman ;
Murat, Francois J. ;
Pasticier, Gilles ;
Rebillard, Xavier ;
Rewcastle, John C. ;
Robertson, Cary N. ;
Thuroff, Stefan ;
Ward, John F. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (08) :1058-1062
[3]   High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review [J].
Chaussy, Christian G. ;
Thueroff, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 :S30-S37
[4]   EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [J].
Cornford, Philip ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Briers, Erik ;
De Santis, Maria ;
Gross, Tobias ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Mottet, Nicolas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) :630-642
[5]   Whole-gland Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer with High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: Oncologic Outcomes and Morbidity in 1002 Patients [J].
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Chapelon, Jean Yves ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Tonoli-Catez, Helene ;
Martin, Xavier ;
Gelet, Albert .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (05) :907-914
[6]   Multicentric Oncologic Outcomes of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Localized Prostate Cancer in 803 Patients [J].
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Rebillard, Xavier ;
Chevallier, Daniel ;
Rischmann, Pascal ;
Pasticier, Gilles ;
Garcia, Gregory ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Chapelon, Jean-Yves ;
Gelet, Albert .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) :559-566
[7]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[8]   Medium- term Outcomes after Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer from a Multicentre Registry Cohort [J].
Dickinson, Louise ;
Arya, Manit ;
Afzal, Naveed ;
Cathcart, Paul ;
Charman, Susan C. ;
Cornaby, Andrew ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Lewi, Henry ;
McCartan, Neil ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Nathan, Senthil ;
Ogden, Chris ;
Persad, Raj ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Weir, Shraddha ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (04) :668-674
[9]  
Fitzmaurice C, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P524, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706]
[10]   Which technology to select for primary focal treatment of prostate cancer?-European Section of Urotechnology (ESUT) position statement [J].
Ganzer, Roman ;
Arthanareeswaran, Vinodh Kumar Adithyaa ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Rischmann, Pascal ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Teber, Dogu ;
Liatsikos, Evangelos ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Barret, Eric .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (02) :175-186