共 50 条
Survival and CT defined sarcopenia in patients with intestinal failure on home parenteral support
被引:20
|作者:
Oke, Siddhartha M.
[1
,2
]
Rye, Beth
[1
]
Malietzis, George
[1
,2
]
Baldwin-Cleland, Rachel
[1
]
Bottle, Alex
[3
]
Gabe, Simon M.
[1
,2
]
Lung, Phillip F. C.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] St Marks Hosp, Watford Rd, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
[3] Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词:
Intestinal failure;
Sarcopenia;
L3 skeletal muscle index;
Survival;
CT;
BODY SKELETAL-MUSCLE;
NUTRITION DEPENDENCE;
ADULT PATIENTS;
AGE;
EXPERIENCE;
TOMOGRAPHY;
GUIDELINES;
MANAGEMENT;
INFECTION;
STRENGTH;
D O I:
10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.015
中图分类号:
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生];
TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号:
100403 ;
摘要:
Background & aims: Sarcopenia occurs in patients with intestinal failure (IF) and has been associated with poorer survival in several chronic diseases. CT can measure sarcopenia through a L3 skeletal muscle index (LSMI). We aim to describe the prevalence of sarcopenia in a section of our IF population using LSMI, & evaluate the effect of home parenteral support (PS) on LSMI & survival. Additionally, we aim to assess any association between LSMI, BMI & other anthropometric measurements. Methods: IF patients on PS treated at St Mark's Hospital between 1/1/2006-1/10/2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were included if they were on PS & had 2 CTs: the first <= 30 days before start of HPN (pre-PS); the second >= 100 days from PS start (post-PS). Patient records were reviewed to obtain clinical & demographic information & date of death. Anthropometric measurements & BMI contemporaneous to CT scans were recorded. Results: 64 patients met inclusion criteria (M:F 1:1). 83% of our cohort had LSMI below previously published thresholds for sarcopenia. Mean (SD) pre-PS LSMI was 36.5 (6.8)cm(2)/m(2). Mean BMI pre-PS was 22.1 (4.8) kg/m(2). Both BMI (22.1 kg/m(2) to 23.5 kg/m(2)) p < 0.001) & LSMI (36.5 cm(2)/m(2) to 38.4 cm(2)/m(2)) (p = 0.003) increased post-PS. A positive correlation was seen between BMI & LSMI pre (r = 0.47 p < 0.001) & post-PS (r = 0.37 p = 0.003). No correlation was seen between LSMI & anthropometric measurements pre-PS (p = 0.78) or post-PS (p = 0.96). 11 (17%) patients died during the study period; a low LSMI pre-PS was not a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.97 p = 0.55). Conclusions: This study is the first to look at sarcopenia & survival using CT defined LSMI (CT-LSMI) in the IF population. 83% of our cohort had a pre-PS LSMI below previously published thresholds, yet we found no relationship between lower baseline LSMI & survival. This may reflect the heterogeneity of the prognoses of the IF population, or that parenteral nutrition itself affects survival. Our study showed that LSMI & BMI improved following PS but demonstrated that other anthropometric measurements had poor correlation with LSMI & showed no significant improvement overall after PS, confirming the known problems of inter-operator & patient variability of these measurements. Whilst we found significant correlation between LSMI & BMI, BMI significantly underestimated the presence & degree of sarcopenia. LSMI has the potential to provide an objective & reproducible measure of sarcopenia in IF. Future larger studies should be performed to evaluate associations with patient outcomes & utility in clinical decision making. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 836
页数:8
相关论文