Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women

被引:16
作者
Larijani, B
Dabbaghmanesh, MH
Aghakhani, S
Sedaghat, M
Hamidi, Z
Rahimi, E
机构
[1] Shariati Hosp, Endocrinol & Metab Res Ctr, Tehran 14114, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
bone mineral density; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; menopause; osteoporosis; quantitative ultrasonography;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2005.24.7.941
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives. In this study, we sought the proper cutoff level for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of the heel in identifying bone mineral density (BMD) categories as determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in postmenopausal women. Methods. With the use of DXA, BMD categories of the lumbar spine and different areas of the left femur of 420 healthy women according to World Health Organization definitions were determined. Quantitative ultrasonography of the heel was also performed in each subject. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and sensitivity and specificity of QUS to diagnose osteoporosis were examined at different points to identify the best cutoff level. The diagnostic agreement between the two techniques in identifying osteoporosis was assessed with K scores. Results. The K scores were 0.31 for the lumbar region and 0.5 for the femoral neck region. On the receiver operating characteristic study, a score of -1 was found to be the appropriate cutoff point for QUS studies, in which the sensitivity of QUS to diagnose BMD osteoporosis varied between 78% and 87.5% depending on the site of the DXA study. With the proposed cutoff point (-1), sensitivity and specificity of QUS in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 83.9% and 51%, respectively, and at the femoral neck were 84% and 50%, respectively. Conclusions. Insufficient agreement between QUS and DXA led to uncertainty on expected 3MD in people tested by QUS. The proposed cutoff value could achieve higher sensitivity but only by accepting higher rates of false-positive results.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 946
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Osteoporosis after gastrectomy: bone mineral density of lumbar spine assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Adachi, Y ;
Shiota, E ;
Matsumata, T ;
Iso, Y ;
Yoh, R ;
Kitano, S .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 66 (02) :119-122
[22]   In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Bandirali, Michele ;
Sconfienza, Luca M. ;
Aliprandi, Alberto ;
Di Leo, Giovanni ;
Marchelli, Daniele ;
Ulivieri, Fabio M. ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (04) :257-260
[23]   Bone density measurements in children and adolescents - Quantitative computed tomography versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Pitukcheewanont, P ;
Chen, P .
ENDOCRINOLOGIST, 2005, 15 (04) :232-239
[24]   Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Hester, PY ;
Schreiweis, MA ;
Orban, JI ;
Mazzuco, H ;
Kopka, MN ;
Ledur, MC ;
Moody, DE .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (02) :215-221
[25]   Effect of Strength Training Protocol on Bone Mineral Density for Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia/Osteoporosis Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) [J].
Holubiac, Iulian Stefan ;
Leuciuc, Florin Valentin ;
Craciun, Daniela Maria ;
Dobrescu, Tatiana .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (05)
[26]   Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry overestimates bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in persons with spinal cord injury [J].
Bauman, W. A. ;
Schwartz, E. ;
Song, I. S. Y. ;
Kirshblum, S. ;
Cirnigliaro, C. ;
Morrison, N. ;
Spungen, A. M. .
SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (08) :628-633
[27]   Is Bone Mineral Density Measurement Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Affected by Gamma Rays? [J].
Xie, Liang-Jun ;
Li, Jian-Fang ;
Zeng, Feng-Wei ;
Jiang, Hang ;
Cheng, Mu-Hua ;
Chen, Yi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2013, 16 (03) :275-278
[28]   Characteristics of bone mineral density and soft tissue composition of obese Japanese women: Application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Takata, S ;
Ikata, T ;
Yonezu, H .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 1999, 17 (03) :206-210
[29]   Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes [J].
Yu, Wei ;
Zhang, Zaizhu ;
Pan, Wei ;
Guan, Wenmin ;
Lin, Qiang ;
Xia, Weibo ;
Li, Taisheng ;
Hsieh, Evelyn .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2021, 24 (04) :645-650
[30]   Inverse Correlation at the Hip Between Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Cortical Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography [J].
Amstrup, Anne Kristine ;
Jakobsen, Niels Frederik Breum ;
Lomholt, Soren ;
Sikjaer, Tanja ;
Mosekilde, Leif ;
Rejnmark, Lars .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2016, 19 (02) :226-233