Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders

被引:1
作者
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto [1 ]
Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade [1 ]
Dias, Celia da Consolacao [1 ]
Dias Miranda, Angelica Conceicao
机构
[1] Univ Fed Espirito Santos, Campus Goiabeiras, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
来源
RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO | 2022年 / 20卷
关键词
Open Science; Scientific communication; Mathematical methods; Statistical methods; Factor analysis; Information Science;
D O I
10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Abadal E., 2020, Anuario ThinkEPI, V14, P1874, DOI [10.3145/thinkepi.2020.e14e02, DOI 10.3145/THINKEPI.2020.E14E02]
[2]  
AGANETTE E., 2010, INFORM SOC, V20
[3]  
Albagli Sarita., 1996, Ci. Inf., Brasilia, V25, n, P396
[4]  
ALVES L., 2011, DATAGRAMAZERO REV IN, V12, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BRAZ
[6]  
[Anonymous], d'identification, faunistique
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ANAL MULTIVARIADA DA
[8]  
Arthur C., 2013, TECH GIANTS MAY BE H
[9]  
Autran M.M. M., 2014, RECIIS - Revista Eletronica de Comunicacao, Informacao E Inovacao Em Saude, V8, P122, DOI DOI 10.3395/RECIIS.V8I2.910.PT
[10]  
Ayris P., 2018, OPEN SCI ITS ROLE U