When seeking help, women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly stating their identity

被引:16
作者
Kirgios, Erika L. [1 ]
Rai, Aneesh [1 ]
Chang, Edward H. [2 ]
Milkman, Katherine L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Operat Informat & Decis, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard Business Sch, Dept Negotiat Org & Markets, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FIELD EXPERIMENT; RACIAL-DISCRIMINATION; PREJUDICE; WHITE; RACE; BIAS; GENDER; IDENTIFICATION; CONSEQUENCES; STEREOTYPES;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-021-01253-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Receiving help can make or break a career, but women and racial/ethnic minorities do not always receive the support they seek. Across two audit experiments-one with politicians and another with students-as well as an online experiment (total n = 5,145), we test whether women and racial/ethnic minorities benefit from explicitly mentioning their demographic identity in requests for help, for example, by including statements like "As a Black woman horizontal ellipsis " in their communications. We propose that when a help seeker highlights their marginalized identity, it may activate prospective helpers' motivations to avoid prejudiced reactions and increase their willingness to provide support. Here we show that when women and racial/ethnic minorities explicitly mentioned their demographic identity in help-seeking emails, politicians and students responded 24.4% (7.42 percentage points) and 79.6% (2.73 percentage points) more often, respectively. These findings suggest that deliberately mentioning identity in requests for help can improve outcomes for women and racial/ethnic minorities. In two audit experiments with politicians and students, and an online experiment, Kirgios et al. show that women and racial/ethnic minorities seeking help are more likely to receive support when they explicitly mention their marginalized demographic identity.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The NCES Fast Facts Tool provides quick answers to many education questions
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CIT TOWN POP TOT 201
[4]   Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction [J].
Apfelbaurn, Evan P. ;
Sommers, Samuel R. ;
Norton, Michael I. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (04) :918-932
[5]   Automatic stereotyping [J].
Banaji, MR ;
Hardin, CD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (03) :136-141
[6]   Private e-mail requests and the diffusion of responsibility [J].
Barron, G ;
Yechiam, E .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 18 (05) :507-520
[7]   Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (04) :991-1013
[8]  
Bodner Ronit., 2003, PSYCHOL EC DECISIONS, V1, P105, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199251063.003.0006
[9]   The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence [J].
Bohren, J. Aislinn ;
Imas, Alex ;
Rosenberg, Michael .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 109 (10) :3395-3436
[10]   Yes, But What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer) [J].
Bullock, John G. ;
Green, Donald P. ;
Ha, Shang E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 98 (04) :550-558