Laparoscopic In Situ Dismembered Pyeloplasty Can Facilitate Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair: A Prospective Cohort Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Aminsharifi, Alireza [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Molaie, Afshin [1 ]
Monsef, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Laparoscopy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol Surg, Erwin St, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty; modifications; ureteropelvic junction obstruction; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1089/end.2017.0538
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the technique of laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty as a modified technique during which the alignment of ureter and renal pelvis remains intact during ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) anastomosis. We also assessed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of this modification in comparison to standard laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Patients and Methods: Patients with significant primary UPJ obstruction without any history of abdominal surgery, high ureter insertion, or renal anomalies were considered. The patients were consecutively enrolled one after another into one of two study groups: classic laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (Group I) or laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty (Group II), however, those with aberrant vessels crossing the UPJ were allocated specifically to Group I because UPJ anastomosis should be done anterior to the aberrant vessels. Demographic data, intraoperative timings, and postoperative and follow-up outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results: Patients in Group I (n=23) and Group II (n=14) had similar demographic characteristics. Mean operative time was significantly longer in Group I (103.819.95 minutes vs 89.5 +/- 18.90 minutes, p=0.038). Total duration of UPJ repair and anastomosis was also significantly longer in Group I (92.7 +/- 15.82 minutes vs 78.4 +/- 14.76 minutes, p=0.021). The method of pyeloplasty significantly affected the time required to prepare ureter and renal pelvis (p=0.017) and the duration of UPJ anastomosis (p=0.014). Both were shorter in Group II. Mean follow-up period was 14.4 +/- 7.42 months in Group I and 14.05 +/- 7.93 months in Group II (p=0.88). Success rate was 95.6% in Group I and 100% in Group II (p=0.42). Conclusion: Laparoscopic in situ pyeloplasty is a safe and effective approach that can help simplify laparoscopic pyeloplasty, especially at teaching centers where surgeons with variable levels of experience perform laparoscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Flank, Dorsal Lumbotomy and Laparoscopic Approaches for Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children Older Than 3 Years With Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Braga, Luis H. P.
    Lorenzo, Armando J.
    Baegli, Darius J.
    Mahdi, Mohamed
    Salle, Joao L. Pippi
    Khoury, Antoine E.
    Farhat, Walid A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) : 306 - 311
  • [22] Outcomes of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyeloplasty for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adult Patients
    Demirdag, Cetin
    Ozman, Oktay
    Citgez, Sinharib
    Onal, Bulent
    Talat, Zubeyr
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 5 (03): : 174 - 179
  • [23] Application of fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic pyeloplasty for complex ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Tang, Jianer
    Wang, Rongjiang
    Fang, Zhihai
    Yang, Hua
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5751 - 5752
  • [24] Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Varkarakis, IM
    Bhayani, SB
    Allaf, ME
    Inagaki, T
    Ong, AM
    Kavoussi, LR
    Jarrett, TW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01) : 180 - 182
  • [25] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long-term results
    Nishi, Morihiro
    Tsuchida, Mayumi
    Ikeda, Masaomi
    Matsuda, Daisuke
    Iwamura, Masatsugu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (04) : 368 - 371
  • [26] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Crossed Fused Ectopic Pelvic Kidney
    Muruganandham, Kalyaperumal
    Kumar, Avijit
    Kumar, Santosh
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (11) : 764 - 767
  • [27] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with duplex system
    Numakura, Kazuyuki
    Muto, Yumina
    Saito, Mitsuru
    Narita, Shintaro
    Inoue, Takamitsu
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2020, 30
  • [28] Comparison of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults and Children: Lessons Learned
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Umemoto, Yukihiro
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04) : 1461 - 1467
  • [29] Initial Experience with the Comprehensive Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Technique Based on Membrane Anatomy for Treating Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Wu, Guohao
    Li, Haomin
    Zhong, Peifeng
    Chen, Dongjiang
    Zhang, Zhihua
    Guo, Zexiong
    Zhuo, Yumin
    Xue, Lianfang
    Lai, Caiyong
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, : 487 - 494
  • [30] Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China
    Hong, Peng
    Ding, Guangpu
    Zhu, Dongdong
    Yang, Kunlin
    Pan, Jinhong
    Li, Xuesong
    Chen, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Tang, Qi
    Hao, Han
    Zhou, Zhansong
    Zhou, Liqun
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 101 (03) : 337 - 344