Laparoscopic In Situ Dismembered Pyeloplasty Can Facilitate Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair: A Prospective Cohort Trial

被引:5
作者
Aminsharifi, Alireza [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Molaie, Afshin [1 ]
Monsef, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Laparoscopy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol Surg, Erwin St, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty; modifications; ureteropelvic junction obstruction; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1089/end.2017.0538
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the technique of laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty as a modified technique during which the alignment of ureter and renal pelvis remains intact during ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) anastomosis. We also assessed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of this modification in comparison to standard laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Patients and Methods: Patients with significant primary UPJ obstruction without any history of abdominal surgery, high ureter insertion, or renal anomalies were considered. The patients were consecutively enrolled one after another into one of two study groups: classic laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (Group I) or laparoscopic in situ dismembered pyeloplasty (Group II), however, those with aberrant vessels crossing the UPJ were allocated specifically to Group I because UPJ anastomosis should be done anterior to the aberrant vessels. Demographic data, intraoperative timings, and postoperative and follow-up outcomes were compared in the two groups. Results: Patients in Group I (n=23) and Group II (n=14) had similar demographic characteristics. Mean operative time was significantly longer in Group I (103.819.95 minutes vs 89.5 +/- 18.90 minutes, p=0.038). Total duration of UPJ repair and anastomosis was also significantly longer in Group I (92.7 +/- 15.82 minutes vs 78.4 +/- 14.76 minutes, p=0.021). The method of pyeloplasty significantly affected the time required to prepare ureter and renal pelvis (p=0.017) and the duration of UPJ anastomosis (p=0.014). Both were shorter in Group II. Mean follow-up period was 14.4 +/- 7.42 months in Group I and 14.05 +/- 7.93 months in Group II (p=0.88). Success rate was 95.6% in Group I and 100% in Group II (p=0.42). Conclusion: Laparoscopic in situ pyeloplasty is a safe and effective approach that can help simplify laparoscopic pyeloplasty, especially at teaching centers where surgeons with variable levels of experience perform laparoscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 222
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Abdel-Karim, A. M.
    Fahmy, A.
    Moussa, A.
    Rashad, H.
    Elbadry, M.
    Badawy, H.
    Hammady, A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2016, 12 (06) : 401.e1 - 401.e6
  • [12] A new modification of dismembered pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Dayanc, M.
    Kibar, Y.
    Irkilata, H. C.
    Gok, F.
    Tahmaz, L.
    Ors, O.
    Akyol, I.
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 40 (02) : 225 - 229
  • [13] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Outcome of initial 12 procedures
    Iwamura, M
    Soh, S
    Irie, A
    Kadowaki, K
    Matsusita, Y
    Fujioka, T
    Baba, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (07) : 449 - 455
  • [14] Laparoscopic Disconnected Pyeloplasty to Treat Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) in Children
    Chen, Jian-cai
    Zhang, Qi-liang
    Wang, Yun-jin
    Cui, Xu
    Chen, Liu
    Zhang, Jian-qin
    Zhou, Chao-ming
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 9131 - 9137
  • [15] Dismembered and non-dismembered retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Svetozar Subotic
    Hagen Weiss
    Stephen Wyler
    Cyrill A. Rentsch
    Jens Rassweiler
    Alexander Bachmann
    Dogu Teber
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 689 - 695
  • [16] Dismembered and non-dismembered retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Subotic, Svetozar
    Weiss, Hagen
    Wyler, Stephen
    Rentsch, Cyrill A.
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Teber, Dogu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 689 - 695
  • [17] Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Wu Ji-tao
    Gao Zhen-li
    Shi Lei
    Han Bang-min
    Men Chang-ping
    Zhang Peng
    Xia Shu-jie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 122 (22) : 2728 - 2732
  • [18] From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children
    Tam, Yuk Him
    Pang, Kristine Kit Yi
    Wong, Yuen Shan
    Chan, Kin Wai
    Lee, Kim Hung
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (08): : 1012 - 1018
  • [19] Hydronephrosis after retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in adult patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A longitudinal analysis
    Isoyama, Tadahiro
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Inoue, Seiya
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Hinata, Nobuyuki
    Yao, Akihisa
    Honda, Masashi
    Sejima, Takehiro
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 67 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [20] Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children:: Comparison with open surgery
    Piaggio, Lisandro A.
    Franc-Guimond, Julie
    Noh, Paul H.
    Wehry, Mark
    Figueroa, T. Ernesto
    Barthold, Julia
    Gonzalez, Ricardo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04) : 1579 - 1583