NUTRIENT INPUTS TO THE LAURENTIAN GREAT LAKES BY SOURCE AND WATERSHED ESTIMATED USING SPARROW WATERSHED MODELS

被引:185
|
作者
Robertson, Dale M. [1 ]
Saad, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Wisconsin Water Sci Ctr, Middleton, WI 53562 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2011年 / 47卷 / 05期
关键词
watershed modeling; Great Lakes; nutrients; streams; nonpoint-source pollution; point-source pollution; NITROGEN DELIVERY; UNITED-STATES; STREAMS; LOADS; PHOSPHORUS; DEPOSITION; REGRESSION; MICHIGAN; SEDIMENT; ISOTOPES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00574.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nutrient input to the Laurentian Great Lakes continues to cause problems with eutrophication. To reduce the extent and severity of these problems, target nutrient loads were established and Total Maximum Daily Loads are being developed for many tributaries. Without detailed loading information it is difficult to determine if the targets are being met and how to prioritize rehabilitation efforts. To help address these issues, SPAtially Referenced Regressions On Watershed attributes (SPARROW) models were developed for estimating loads and sources of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) from the United States (U. S.) portion of the Great Lakes, Upper Mississippi, Ohio, and Red River Basins. Results indicated that recent U. S. loadings to Lakes Michigan and Ontario are similar to those in the 1980s, whereas loadings to Lakes Superior, Huron, and Erie decreased. Highest loads were from tributaries with the largest watersheds, whereas highest yields were from areas with intense agriculture and large point sources of nutrients. Tributaries were ranked based on their relative loads and yields to each lake. Input from agricultural areas was a significant source of nutrients, contributing similar to 33-44% of the P and similar to 33-58% of the N, except for areas around Superior with little agriculture. Point sources were also significant, contributing similar to 14-44% of the P and 13-34% of the N. Watersheds around Lake Erie contributed nutrients at the highest rate (similar to intensively farmed areas in the Midwest) because they have the largest nutrient inputs and highest delivery ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1033
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] "Nutrient Inputs to the Laurentian Great Lakes by Source and Watershed Estimated Using SPARROW Watershed Models" by Dale M. Robertson and David A. Saad
    Richards, R. Peter
    Alameddine, Ibrahim
    Allan, J. David
    Baker, David B.
    Bosch, Nathan S.
    Confesor, Remegio
    DePinto, Joseph V.
    Dolan, David M.
    Reutter, Jeffrey M.
    Scavia, Donald
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2013, 49 (03): : 715 - 724
  • [2] Phosphorus and Nitrogen Transport in the Binational Great Lakes Basin Estimated Using SPARROW Watershed Models
    Robertson D.M.
    Saad D.A.
    Benoy G.A.
    Vouk I.
    Schwarz G.E.
    Laitta M.T.
    Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2019, 55 (06): : 1401 - 1424
  • [3] Historical watershed stressors for the Laurentian Great Lakes
    Reavie, Euan D.
    Cai, Meijun
    Brown, Terry N.
    GEOSCIENCE DATA JOURNAL, 2018, 5 (01): : 4 - 8
  • [4] Assessing nutrient and sediment load reduction potential of vegetation by utilizing the nutrient tracking tool at the field and watershed scale in a Great Lakes priority watershed
    Pawlowski, Ethan D.
    Karwan, Diana L.
    Kolka, Randall K.
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2023, 23 (07) : 2905 - 2921
  • [5] Assessing nutrient and sediment load reduction potential of vegetation by utilizing the nutrient tracking tool at the field and watershed scale in a Great Lakes priority watershed
    Ethan D. Pawlowski
    Diana L. Karwan
    Randall K. Kolka
    Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2023, 23 : 2905 - 2921
  • [6] Influences of Multi-Scale Habitat on Metabolism in a Coastal Great Lakes Watershed
    Ogdahl, Mary E.
    Lougheed, Vanessa L.
    Stevenson, R. Jan
    Steinman, Alan D.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 13 (02) : 222 - 238
  • [7] Climate Change Impacts on Flow, Sediment and Nutrient Export in a Great Lakes Watershed Using SWAT
    Verma, Siddhartha
    Bhattarai, Rabin
    Bosch, Nathan S.
    Cooke, Richard C.
    Kalita, Prasanta K.
    Markus, Momcilo
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2015, 43 (11) : 1464 - 1474
  • [8] Thinking outside of the lake: Can controls on nutrient inputs into Lake Erie benefit stream conservation in its watershed?
    Keitzer, S. Conor
    Ludsin, Stuart A.
    Sowa, Scott P.
    Annis, Gust
    Arnold, Jeff G.
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Froehlich, August M.
    Herbert, Matt E.
    Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V.
    Sasson, Anthony M.
    Yen, Haw
    White, Mike J.
    Rewa, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (06) : 1322 - 1331
  • [9] Influence of nutrient mitigation measures on the fractional export of watershed inputs in an urban watershed
    Gao, Wei
    Duan, Zhongzhao
    Yan, Chang'an
    Liu, Change
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (15) : 18521 - 18529
  • [10] Estimating phosphorus retention of existing and restored coastal wetlands in a tributary watershed of the Laurentian Great Lakes in Michigan, USA
    Wang N.
    Mitsch W.J.
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 1998, 6 (1) : 69 - 82