Participatory research in Germany - quo vadis?

被引:16
作者
von Peter, Sebastian [1 ]
Baer, Gesine [2 ]
Behrisch, Birgit [3 ]
Bethmann, Andreas [4 ]
Hartung, Susanne [5 ]
Kasberg, Azize [6 ]
Wulff, Ines [7 ]
Wright, Michael [8 ]
机构
[1] Med Hsch Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Psychiat, D-16816 Neuruppin, Germany
[2] Alice Salomon Hsch Berlin, Hsch Sozialarbeit & Sozialpadag Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Katholische Hsch Sozialwesen Berlin, Inklus Padag, Berlin, Germany
[4] Katholische Hsch Sozialwesen Berlin, PartKommPlus, Berlin, Germany
[5] Hsch Neubrandenburg, Gesundheitsforderung, Neubrandenburg, Germany
[6] Gesundheistwissensch, Alice Salomon Hsch Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[7] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Pflegewissensch, Berlin, Germany
[8] Gesundheitswissensch, Katholische Hsch Sozialwesen Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
participation; funding; health; criteria; involvment; HEALTH-PROMOTION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1055/a-1076-8078
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Goal Participatory Health Research (PHR) approaches are becoming more common in Germany. In this paper, appropriate support strategies for the funding and implementation of PHR projects in Germany are described. Method Nine strategies are discussed, based on the research experience of the German Network for Participatory Health Research (PartNet) and other international networks. Results In order to foster PHR in Germany, 1) funds have to be available for those participating in the research process, and 2) for the participatory processes themselves; 3) the requirement to promote participation should be incorporated routinely in tender notices, as well as 4) in special funding programs as a funding requirement; 5) participation in research projects should be part of a formative evaluation; 6) methodology development in this field needs specific funding; 7) review processes for research bids need to be adapted to take into account the specifics of PHR; 8) coordination needs to be established across participatory research projects; 9) and successful models and examples of participation in research should be disseminated. Conclusion It is necessary to adapt research funding programs in Germany to the specific requirements of PHR so as to promote meaningful participation on the part of non-academic partners and to avoid tokenism.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, PLOS ONE, V13
  • [2] Bucher T, 2011, GEMEINSAMES FORSCHEN, P4
  • [3] A systematic mixed studies review on Organizational Participatory Research: towards operational guidance
    Bush, Paula Louise
    Pluye, Pierre
    Loignon, Christine
    Granikov, Vera
    Wright, Michael T.
    Repchinsky, Carol
    Haggerty, Jeannie
    Bartlett, Gillian
    Parry, Sharon
    Pelletier, Jean-Francois
    Macaulay, Ann C.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [4] Dennert G., 2019, PARTIZIPATIVE FORSCH
  • [5] The Interplay between Participatory Health Research and Implementation Research: Canadian Research Funding Perspectives
    Di Ruggiero, Erica
    Edwards, Nancy
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [6] Outline of a critical best practice perspective on social work and social care
    Ferguson, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2003, 33 (08) : 1005 - 1024
  • [7] Fetterman D.M., 1995, Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability
  • [8] Practice-based evidence: Towards collaborative and transgressive research
    Fox, NJ
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 37 (01): : 81 - 102
  • [9] Friere Paulo., 1970, PEDAGOGY OPPRESSED
  • [10] Funk S, 2016, GESU2016040276OAR1