Submitting surveys via a conversational interface: An evaluation of user acceptance and approach effectiveness

被引:20
作者
Celino, Irene [1 ]
Calegari, Gloria Re [1 ]
机构
[1] Cefriel Politecn Milano, Viale Sarca 226, I-20126 Milan, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Conversational survey; Survey design and administration; Questionnaire reliability; Questionnaire response quality; User experience; Quantitative research; FACE-TO-FACE; INTERVIEW; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102410
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Conversational interfaces are currently on the rise: more and more applications rely on a chat-like interaction pattern to increase their acceptability and to improve user experience. Also in the area of questionnaire design and administration, interaction design is increasingly looked at as an important ingredient of a digital solution. For those reasons, we designed and developed a conversational survey tool to administer questionnaires with a colloquial form through a chat-like Web interface. In this paper, we present the evaluation results of our approach, taking into account both the user point of view - by assessing user acceptance and preferences in terms of survey compilation experience - and the survey design perspective - by investigating the effectiveness of a conversational survey in comparison to a traditional questionnaire. We show that users clearly appreciate the conversational form and prefer it over a traditional approach and that, from a data collection point of view, the conversational method shows the same reliability and a higher response quality with respect to a traditional questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [21] Galtung Johan., 1967, THEORY METHODS SOCIA
  • [22] Neural Approaches to Conversational AI
    Gao, Jianfeng
    Galley, Michel
    Li, Lihong
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2019, 13 (2-3): : 127 - 298
  • [23] Engaging women with an embodied conversational agent to deliver mindfulness and lifestyle recommendations: A feasibility randomized control trial
    Gardiner, Paula M.
    McCue, Kelly D.
    Negash, Lily M.
    Cheng, Teresa
    White, Laura F.
    Yinusa-Nyahkoon, Leanne
    Jack, Brian W.
    Bickmore, Timothy W.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (09) : 1720 - 1729
  • [24] COMPUTER INTERVIEW FOR SUICIDE-RISK PREDICTION
    GREIST, JH
    GUSTAFSON, DH
    STAUSS, FF
    ROWSE, GL
    LAUGHREN, TP
    CHILES, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1973, 130 (12) : 1327 - 1332
  • [25] Testing the Difference of Correlated Agreement Coefficients for Statistical Significance
    Gwet, Kilem L.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2016, 76 (04) : 609 - 637
  • [26] FACE-TO-FACE VERSUS WEB SURVEYING IN A HIGH-INTERNET-COVERAGE POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE QUALITY
    Heerwegh, Dirk
    Loosveldt, Geert
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (05) : 836 - 846
  • [27] Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots
    Jain, Mohit
    Kumar, Pratyush
    Kota, Ramachandra
    Patel, Shwetak N.
    [J]. DIS 2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 2018, : 895 - 906
  • [28] Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity
    Joinson, AN
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (02) : 177 - 192
  • [29] Understanding dynamics between initial trust and usage intentions of mobile banking
    Kim, Gimun
    Shin, BongSik
    Lee, Ho Geun
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2009, 19 (03) : 283 - 311
  • [30] Kim Soomin, 2019, C HUMAN FACTORS COMP, P86, DOI DOI 10.1145/3290605.3300316