Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation

被引:26
作者
Ping, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Wenjun [1 ]
Tan, Hongzhuan [2 ]
Guo, Chongzheng [1 ]
Dou, Zhiyong [3 ]
Yang, Jianzhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Changzhi Med Coll, Dept Prevent Med, Changzhi, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Heping Hosp, Changzhi Med Coll, Hlth Check Ctr, Changzhi, Shanxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIFE-STYLE PROFILE; GREEK VERSION; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK-FACTORS; SHORT-FORM; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0190390
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale. Methods An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis. Results The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34. Conclusions HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PARALLEL ANAL POLYCH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, THE VACCINE BOOK
  • [3] [Anonymous], REG OFF W PAC NEW HO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, J CLIN PSYCHIAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], MED STAT COMPUTERIZE
  • [6] A gene to organism approachassessing the impact of environmental pollution in eelpout (Zoarces viviparus) females and larvae
    Asker, Noomi
    Almroth, Bethanie Carney
    Albertsson, Eva
    Coltellaro, Mariateresa
    Bignell, John Paul
    Hanson, Niklas
    Scarcelli, Vittoria
    Fagerholm, Bjoern
    Parkkonen, Jari
    Wijkmark, Emma
    Frenzilli, Giada
    Forlin, Lars
    Sturve, Joachim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 34 (07) : 1511 - 1523
  • [7] Berra K, 2015, MENOPAUSE, V22, P453, DOI [10.1097/GME.0000000000000455, 10.1097/gme.0000000000000455]
  • [8] Association between Lifestyle Factors and CpG Island Methylation in a Cancer-Free Population
    Brait, Mariana
    Ford, Jean G.
    Papaiahgari, Srinivas
    Garza, Mary A.
    Lee, Jin I.
    Loyo, Myriam
    Maldonado, Leonel
    Begum, Shahnaz
    McCaffrey, Lee
    Howerton, Mollie
    Sidransky, David
    Emerson, Mark R.
    Ahmed, Saifuddin
    Williams, Carla D.
    Hoque, Mohammad Obaidul
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (11) : 2984 - 2991
  • [9] Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine Country Reliability and Validity Study
    Bull, Fiona C.
    Maslin, Tahlia S.
    Armstrong, Timothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2009, 6 (06) : 790 - 804
  • [10] Factor analysis of a health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP): Application to older adults in Mainland China
    Cao, Wen-Jun
    Chen, Chang-Sheng
    Hua, Yan
    Li, Yun-Ming
    Xu, Yong-Yong
    Hua, Qian-Zhen
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2012, 55 (03) : 632 - 638