Critical period of weed control in chickpea under non-irrigated conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Tepe, Isik [1 ]
Erman, Murat [2 ]
Yergin, Reyyan [1 ]
Bukun, Bekir [3 ]
机构
[1] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[2] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[3] Harran Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey
关键词
Chickpea; critical period; weeds; weed competition; INTERFERENCE; CORN; ROW;
D O I
10.3906/tar-1007-956
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted during the growing seasons of 2005, 2006, and 2007 to determine the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in chickpea (cv. Aziziye 94). In order to evaluate the beginning of CPWC, weeds were allowed to compete at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 weeks after emergence (WAE) and, at the end of CPWC, plots were kept weed-free at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 WAE by periodic hand hoeing. The beginning and the end of CPWC were based on 5% acceptable yield loss (AYL) levels, which were determined by fitting logistic and Gompertz equations to relative yield data, representing increasing duration of weed-interference and weed-free period, estimated as growing degree days (GDDs). The major weed species were Centaurea depressa Bieb. and Bromus tectorum L. for the 1st year, Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Amaranthus sp. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 2nd year and Amaranthus spp., Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Sisymbrium septulatum DC. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 3rd year. Overall weed density was 190 plants m(-2) in 2005, 215 plants m(-2) in 2006, and 191 plants m(-2) in 2007. Yield losses were 26.4% in 2005, 31.5% in 2006, and 25.0% in 2007 when the crop was not weeded. It was found that at the 5% AYL level CPWC was 2.32 WAE to harvest in the 1st year, from emergence to harvest in the 2nd year, and from 0.34 WAE to harvest in the 3rd year. The present findings suggest that the determination of CPWC is crucial in chickpea production.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cover cropping in a sloping, non-irrigated vineyard:: I -: Effects on weed composition and dynamics
    Monteiro, A.
    Lopes, C. M.
    Machado, J. P.
    Fernandes, N.
    Araujo, A.
    Moreira, I.
    CIENCIA E TECNICA VITIVINICOLA, 2008, 23 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [32] Weed dynamics, crop growth and yield attributes of irrigated chickpea in response to chemical weed control
    Arshad, Nouman
    Matloob, Amar
    Aziz, Mudassir
    Raza Khan, Mohsin Ali
    Amin, Muhammad
    Mobli, Ahmadreza
    Hussain, Khalid
    Manan Khan, Abdul
    Ali, Zulfiqar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2021,
  • [33] SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH UNDER NON-IRRIGATED AND IRRIGATED SHORT DURATION GRAZING SYSTEMS
    Ribeiro Carvalho, Rita de Cassia
    Rocha, Wellington Willian
    Pinto, Jose Cardoso
    Pires, Bruno da Silva
    Dias, Moacir de Souza, Jr.
    Braga Nunes, Ayeska Hubner
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2010, 34 (03): : 631 - 638
  • [34] Predawn leaf water potential and soil water content in vertical trellis under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions in Tempranillo grapevines
    Yuste, J
    Rubio, JA
    Peláez, HJ
    Ruiz, C
    Lissarrague, JR
    FIRST ISHS WORKSHOP ON WATER RELATIONS OF GRAPEVINES, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, (493): : 309 - 321
  • [35] Evaluation of sweet sorghum planting density and minimal nitrogen input, under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions, for bioethanol feedstock production
    Rouse, Christopher E.
    Burgos, Nilda R.
    Singh, Vijay
    Earnest, Larry
    BIOFUELS-UK, 2020, 11 (05): : 577 - 586
  • [36] Physiological response of irrigated and non-irrigated Norway spruce trees as a consequence of drought in field conditions
    Kurjak, Daniel
    Strelcova, Katarina
    Ditmarova, Lubica
    Priwitzer, Tibor
    Kmet', Jaroslav
    Homolak, Marian
    Pichler, Viliam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 131 (06) : 1737 - 1746
  • [37] Evaluation of Organic Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Weed Control Efficiency in Soybean-chickpea Sequence under Irrigated Condition
    Chavan, A. A.
    Narkhede, W. N.
    Garud, H. S.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (08) : 921 - 928
  • [38] Estimation of critical period of weed control
    Singh, M
    Saxena, MC
    AbuIrmaileh, BE
    AlThahabi, SA
    Haddad, NI
    WEED SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [39] Critical Period for Weed Control in Alfalfa
    Dillehay, Bryan L.
    Curran, William S.
    Mortensen, David A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2011, 59 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [40] Application of molybdenum fertilizer enhanced quality and production of alfalfa in northern China under non-irrigated conditions
    Mao, Xiaotao
    Li, Qingfeng
    Ren, Lifei
    Bai, Wenming
    Zhang, Wen-Hao
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2018, 41 (08) : 1009 - 1019