Critical period of weed control in chickpea under non-irrigated conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Tepe, Isik [1 ]
Erman, Murat [2 ]
Yergin, Reyyan [1 ]
Bukun, Bekir [3 ]
机构
[1] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[2] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[3] Harran Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey
关键词
Chickpea; critical period; weeds; weed competition; INTERFERENCE; CORN; ROW;
D O I
10.3906/tar-1007-956
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted during the growing seasons of 2005, 2006, and 2007 to determine the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in chickpea (cv. Aziziye 94). In order to evaluate the beginning of CPWC, weeds were allowed to compete at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 weeks after emergence (WAE) and, at the end of CPWC, plots were kept weed-free at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 WAE by periodic hand hoeing. The beginning and the end of CPWC were based on 5% acceptable yield loss (AYL) levels, which were determined by fitting logistic and Gompertz equations to relative yield data, representing increasing duration of weed-interference and weed-free period, estimated as growing degree days (GDDs). The major weed species were Centaurea depressa Bieb. and Bromus tectorum L. for the 1st year, Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Amaranthus sp. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 2nd year and Amaranthus spp., Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Sisymbrium septulatum DC. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 3rd year. Overall weed density was 190 plants m(-2) in 2005, 215 plants m(-2) in 2006, and 191 plants m(-2) in 2007. Yield losses were 26.4% in 2005, 31.5% in 2006, and 25.0% in 2007 when the crop was not weeded. It was found that at the 5% AYL level CPWC was 2.32 WAE to harvest in the 1st year, from emergence to harvest in the 2nd year, and from 0.34 WAE to harvest in the 3rd year. The present findings suggest that the determination of CPWC is crucial in chickpea production.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Leaching losses of N under grazed irrigated and non-irrigated pastures
    Pakrou, N
    Dillon, PJ
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2004, 142 : 503 - 516
  • [22] CRITICAL PERIOD OF WEED COMPETITION ON IRRIGATED ANNUAL COTTON
    DEAZEVEDO, DMP
    BELTRAO, NED
    DANOBREGA, LB
    DOSSANTOS, JW
    VIEIRA, DJ
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1994, 29 (09) : 1417 - 1425
  • [23] SEED AND OIL YIELDS OF RAPESEED (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) CULTIVARS UNDER IRRIGATED AND NON-IRRIGATED CONDITIONS
    Rad, A. H. S.
    Abbasian, A.
    Aminpanah, H.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2014, 24 (01): : 204 - 210
  • [24] Nitrogen and potassium fertilization of 'Nanicao' banana (Musa AAA cavendish subgroup) under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Teixeira, LAJ
    Natale, W
    Ruggiero, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL FRUITS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2002, (575): : 771 - 779
  • [25] Modelling capillary rise and soil salinity for shallow saline water table under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Jorenush, MH
    Sepaskhah, AR
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2003, 61 (02) : 125 - 141
  • [26] Post-establishment landscape performance of Florida native and exotic shrubs under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Scheiber, Sloane
    Gilman, Edward
    Sandrock, David
    Paz, Maria
    HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (04) : 965 - 965
  • [27] Soil compressibility under non-irrigated and irrigated short duration grazing systems
    Lima, CLR
    Silva, AP
    Imhoff, S
    Leao, TP
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2004, 28 (06): : 945 - 951
  • [28] The horticultural performance of five 'Tahiti' lime selections grafted onto 'Swingle' citrumelo under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Bremer Neto, Horst
    Alves Mourao Filho, Francisco de Assis
    Stuchi, Eduardo Sanches
    Espinoza-Nunez, Erick
    Cantuarias-Aviles, Tatiana
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2013, 150 : 181 - 186
  • [29] Comparative study of water relation in three cultivars of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L) under non-irrigated and irrigated conditions
    Kundu, PB
    Paul, NK
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1996, 25 (02): : 147 - 153
  • [30] The influence of climate and soil on viticultural and enological parameters of 'Sangiovese' grapevines under non-irrigated conditions
    Storchi, P
    Costantini, EAC
    Bucelli, P
    Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology and Biotechnology, 2005, (689): : 333 - 340