Critical period of weed control in chickpea under non-irrigated conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Tepe, Isik [1 ]
Erman, Murat [2 ]
Yergin, Reyyan [1 ]
Bukun, Bekir [3 ]
机构
[1] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[2] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-65080 Van, Turkey
[3] Harran Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey
关键词
Chickpea; critical period; weeds; weed competition; INTERFERENCE; CORN; ROW;
D O I
10.3906/tar-1007-956
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The present study was conducted during the growing seasons of 2005, 2006, and 2007 to determine the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in chickpea (cv. Aziziye 94). In order to evaluate the beginning of CPWC, weeds were allowed to compete at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 weeks after emergence (WAE) and, at the end of CPWC, plots were kept weed-free at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 WAE by periodic hand hoeing. The beginning and the end of CPWC were based on 5% acceptable yield loss (AYL) levels, which were determined by fitting logistic and Gompertz equations to relative yield data, representing increasing duration of weed-interference and weed-free period, estimated as growing degree days (GDDs). The major weed species were Centaurea depressa Bieb. and Bromus tectorum L. for the 1st year, Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Amaranthus sp. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 2nd year and Amaranthus spp., Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Sisymbrium septulatum DC. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 3rd year. Overall weed density was 190 plants m(-2) in 2005, 215 plants m(-2) in 2006, and 191 plants m(-2) in 2007. Yield losses were 26.4% in 2005, 31.5% in 2006, and 25.0% in 2007 when the crop was not weeded. It was found that at the 5% AYL level CPWC was 2.32 WAE to harvest in the 1st year, from emergence to harvest in the 2nd year, and from 0.34 WAE to harvest in the 3rd year. The present findings suggest that the determination of CPWC is crucial in chickpea production.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical period of weed control in winter lentil under non-irrigated conditions in Turkey
    Erman, Murat
    Tepe, Isik
    Bukun, Bekir
    Yergin, Reyyan
    Taskesen, Mehtap
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 3 (08): : 523 - 530
  • [2] Grain yield stability of wheat genotypes under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Okuyama, LA
    Fedeizzi, LC
    Neto, JFB
    BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 48 (05) : 697 - 704
  • [3] Performance of 'Tahiti' lime on twelve rootstocks under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions
    Espinoza-Nunez, Erick
    Alves Mourao Filho, Francisco de Assis
    Stuchi, Eduardo Sanches
    Cantuarias-Aviles, Tatiana
    dos Santos Dias, Carlos Tadeu
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2011, 129 (02) : 227 - 231
  • [4] MINERAL FERTILIZATION FOR DURUM WHEAT UNDER NON-IRRIGATED CONDITIONS
    Muhova, Angelina
    Stefanova-Dobreva, Stefica
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2021, 64 (01): : 473 - 477
  • [5] Critical period of weed interference in chickpea
    Mohammadi, G
    Javanshir, A
    Khooie, FR
    Mohammadi, SA
    Zehtab, S
    Salmasi, SZ
    WEED RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [6] Chemical weed control in dryland and irrigated chickpea
    Lyon, DJ
    Wilson, RG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 959 - 965
  • [7] Agro-biochemical Traits of Wheat Genotypes under Irrigated and Non-irrigated Conditions
    Khan, N.
    Naqvi, F. N.
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 41 (02) : 243 - 254
  • [8] Agro-Biochemical Traits of Wheat Genotypes under Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Conditions
    N. Khan
    F. N. Naqvi
    Cereal Research Communications, 2013, 41 : 243 - 254
  • [9] A STUDY OF THE CHANGE IN FORAGE QUALITY OF LUCERNE GROWN UNDER IRRIGATED AND NON-IRRIGATED CONDITIONS
    LEMAIRE, G
    DURAND, JL
    LILA, M
    AGRONOMIE, 1989, 9 (09): : 841 - 848
  • [10] The Critical Period of Weed Control in Faba Bean and Chickpea in Mediterranean Areas
    Frenda, Alfonso S.
    Ruisi, Paolo
    Saia, Sergio
    Frangipane, Benedetto
    Di Miceli, Giuseppe
    Amato, Gaetano
    Giambalvo, Dario
    WEED SCIENCE, 2013, 61 (03) : 452 - 459