Development of empirical and analytical fragility functions using kernel smoothing methods

被引:64
作者
Noh, Hae Young [1 ]
Lallemant, David [2 ]
Kiremidjian, Anne S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, John A Blume Earthquake Engn Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fragility function; performance-based earthquake engineering; non-parametric analysis; kernel smoothing; uncertainty in damage; uncertainty in ground motion;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.2505
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fragility functions that define the probabilistic relationship between structural damage and ground motion intensity are an integral part of performance-based earthquake engineering or seismic risk analysis. This paper introduces three approaches based on kernel smoothing methods for developing analytical and empirical fragility functions. A kernel assigns a weight to each data that is inversely related to the distance between the data value and the input of the fragility function of interest. The kernel smoothing methods are, therefore, non-parametric forms of data interpolation. These methods enable the implicit treatment of uncertainty in either or both of ground motion intensity and structural damage without making any assumption about the shape of the resulting fragility functions. They are particularly beneficial for sparse, noisy, or non-homogeneous data sets. For illustration purposes, two types of data are considered. The first is a set of numerically simulated responses for a four-story steel moment-resisting frame, and the second is a set of field observations collected after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. The results demonstrate that these methods can develop continuous representations of fragility functions without specifying their functional forms and treat sparse data sets more efficiently than conventional data binning and parametric curve fitting methods. Moreover, various uncertainty analyses are conducted to address the issues of over-fitting, bias, and confidence intervals. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1180
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 2002, Wiley series in probability and statistics, V2nd ed.)., DOI [10.1002/0471249688, DOI 10.1002/0471249688]
[2]  
AISC, 2005, SEISM PROV STRUCT S1, V1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ATC Procedures For Postearthquake Safety Evaluation Of Buildings (ATC-20)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Vision 2000-A Framework for Performance-Based Design
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1985, EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EV
[7]  
[Anonymous], EARTHQUAKE ENG ENG S
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OFF BUILD EV
[9]  
ATC, 2005, FEMA440 report
[10]  
Baker J., 2005, Vector-Valued Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand. Analysis