Focus on the fatal-four: Implications for construction hazard recognition

被引:46
作者
Albert, Alex [1 ]
Pandit, Bhavana [1 ]
Patil, Yashwardhan [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, 2501 Stinson Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
关键词
Construction safety; Hazard recognition; Hazard identification; Occupational safety; Fatal injuries; Injury prevention; Hazard management; RISK PERCEPTION; WORKERS; CRIMINALIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR; INDUSTRY; HEALTH; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104774
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Much effort has been devoted to improving hazard recognition in the construction industry. One such effort is the training outreach program pioneered and promoted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) - commonly known as the Construction Focus Four or the Construction Fatal Four program. This program which is integrated in much of the training efforts offered in the construction industry seeks to promote hazard recognition and management by focusing on the four leading causes of fatal incidents - namely falls, caught-in/between, struck-by, and electrocution (i.e., fatal-four) hazards. Given the emphasis of these hazards in most training efforts, the objective of the current research was to explore if there are any performance disparities among workers in recognizing hazards that fall under the fatal-four and the non-fatal-four hazard categories. To accomplish this research goal, more than 280 workers were recruited from 57 construction workplaces in the United States to participate in a hazard recognition activity. The results of the study reveal that workers fail to recognize a disproportionate number of safety hazards in both the fatal-four and the non-fatal-four hazard categories. However, workers are relatively more proficient in recognizing hazards in the fatal-four hazard category than the non-fatal-four hazard category. More specifically, on average, the participating workers roughly recognized 57% of the fatal-four safety hazards while only recognizing 18% of the non-fatal-four safety hazards. Collectively, these findings suggest that apart from focusing on the fatal-four hazards, training efforts must also focus on the non-fatal-four safety hazards - given the relative poor performance.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ahmed S.M., 2006, Proceedings of CIB W99 International Conference on Global Unity for Safety Health in Construction, P363
[2]   Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: Multiple baseline study [J].
Albert, Alex ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Kleiner, Brian M. .
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, 140 (02)
[3]   Empirical measurement and improvement of hazard recognition skill [J].
Albert, Alex ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Skaggs, Michael ;
Kleiner, Brian .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 93 :1-8
[4]   The application and benefits of job safety analysis [J].
Albrechtsen, Eirik ;
Solberg, Ingvild ;
Svensli, Eva .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 113 :425-437
[5]   Accidents in the construction industry in the Netherlands: An analysis of accident reports using Storybuilder [J].
Ale, B. J. M. ;
Bellamy, L. J. ;
Baksteen, H. ;
Damen, M. ;
Goossens, L. H. J. ;
Hale, A. R. ;
Mud, M. ;
Oh, J. ;
Papazoglou, I. A. ;
Whiston, J. Y. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (10) :1523-1533
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WORK REL INJ FAT KEY
[7]   Workplace hazard identification and management: The case of an underground mining operation [J].
Bahn, Susanne .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 57 :129-137
[8]   Emotional Engagement in Safety Training: Impact of Naturalistic Injury Simulations on the Emotional State of Construction Workers [J].
Bhandari, Siddharth ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (12)
[9]   Costs of occupational musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in the United States [J].
Bhattacharya, Anasua .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2014, 44 (03) :448-454
[10]  
BLS, 2018, INJ ILLN FAT