Behavior of Quintuple Friction Pendulum System Under Near-Fault Earthquakes

被引:14
|
作者
Sodha, A. H. [1 ]
Soni, D. P. [2 ]
Desai, M. K. [1 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol Surat SVNIT, Appl Mech Dept, Surat 395007, Gujarat, India
[2] Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Vasad 388306, Gujarat, India
关键词
Seismic isolation; quintuple friction pendulum system; multi hazard level earthquake; near-fault with forward directivity; fing-step; SEISMIC ISOLATION; FLING STEP; ISOLATOR; DIRECTIVITY; BEARINGS;
D O I
10.1142/S1793431117500178
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Quintuple Friction Pendulum (QTFP) system is a new generation sliding isolation having six spherical sliding surfaces with five effective pendula. Due to multiple sliding surfaces, QTFP system shows highly adaptive behavior under different hazard level of earthquakes, despite being a passive system. The paper describes mathematical model and seismic response of QTFP system under 60 earthquake records consisting of service level, design basis and maximum considered earthquakes. To study the erect of directivity focusing and fling step, additional 15 records consist of far-field, near-fault with forward directivity and fling step erect are also considered. Three types of effective period and effective damping in combination with two different displacement capacities of QTFP bearing resulting in six isolator designs are considered. The seismic demand parameters like base shear, top floor absolute acceleration and isolator displacement have been studied. It is found that the QTFP bearing stir ens at low input, softens with increasing input, and then stiffens again at higher levels of input. Thus, it shows highly adaptive behavior under different hazard levels of earthquake. Further, due to forward and backward momentum conveyed by the directivity pulse, near-fault directivity effect imposes higher demand compared to fling step containing only forward momentum.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic response of structures with friction pendulum inerter system (FPIS) under near-fault earthquakes
    Xue, Zhang
    Men, Jinjie
    Qiang, Rong
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 27 (09) : 1547 - 1563
  • [2] Nonlinear dynamic behavior of base-isolated buildings with the friction pendulum system subjected to near-fault earthquakes
    Mazza, F.
    Sisinno, S.
    MECHANICS BASED DESIGN OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 2017, 45 (03) : 331 - 344
  • [3] Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions
    Jangid, RS
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2005, 27 (03) : 349 - 359
  • [4] Variable friction pendulum system for near-fault ground motions
    Panchal, V. R.
    Jangid, R. S.
    STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2008, 15 (04): : 568 - 584
  • [5] Seismic Response of Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing under Near-Fault Ground Motions
    Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati
    Namiranian, Pejman
    Amiri, Mohamad Shamekhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2016, 16 (06)
  • [6] Evaluation of Steel Diagrid Structural System Under Near-Fault Earthquakes
    Saadati, Davood
    Javadi, Pasha
    Moghadam, A. S.
    Hosseini, Mir Hamid
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 28 (08) : 2330 - 2360
  • [7] The effect of near-fault earthquakes and wavelet-generated artificial near-fault earthquakes on the seismic behavior of rockfill dams
    Sun, Benbo
    Deng, Mingjiang
    Zhang, Sherong
    Wang, Chao
    Cui, Wei
    Du, Min
    Lai, Yishu
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 58
  • [8] Investigation on Seismic Behavior of Historical Tokatli Bridge under Near-Fault Earthquakes
    Karalar, Memduh
    Yesil, Mustafa
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis of variable curvature friction pendulum isolator under near-fault ground motions
    Shahbazi, Parisa
    Taghikhany, Touraj
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [10] Seismic Response of a Viaduct under Near-fault Earthquakes
    Chen Yanjiang
    Zhang Yubo
    Yan Weiming
    Li Yong
    PROGRESS IN STRUCTURE, PTS 1-4, 2012, 166-169 : 2368 - 2372