Stress-strain responses of reconstituted and natural compressible Chicago glacial clay

被引:19
作者
Jung, Young-Hoon [2 ]
Finno, Richard J. [3 ]
Cho, Wanjei [1 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Dept Civil & Env Engrg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Civil & Env Engrg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Civil & Env Engrg, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Chicago clay; Reconstituted samples; Stiffness; Small strain; INITIAL STIFFNESS; SHEAR-STRENGTH; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.01.003
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Reconstituted clay specimens with same stress history are often used to characterize natural samples due to their minimal variability and the reduced impact of sampling disturbance. The use of reconstituted samples is very effective particularly at sites with uniform geologic formation. This paper compares the results and analysis of a laboratory investigation of the very small, small and large strain behaviors of reconstituted and natural Chicago clay. Reconstituted specimens were cut from blocks derived from the slurry consolidation of dried natural Chicago glacial clays. Index properties and results of axially-oriented bender element tests and drained stress probe tests and oedometer tests were compared with data for natural specimens. Even though both sample types share similar index properties, 1D consolidation characteristics and failure lines, softer responses of reconstituted samples are observed in terms of initial shear moduli, shear, bulk and coupled responses and local yielding surface. The differences in those quantities of the two sample types are neither uniform nor proportional with strain levels. The developed structures due to the longer ageing period of natural samples are clearly shown in terms of residual effective stress ratios, shear wave velocity and deformation parameters including coupling between shear and volumetric responses. Thus, the small strain response of natural compressible Chicago glacial clay cannot be simply quantified via reconstituting process presented herein. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 19
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Anderson D.G., 1976, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, V102, P525
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Soil mechanics in engineering practice
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, AM SOC TEST MATER
[4]  
Bishop AW., 1957, MEASUREMENT SOIL PRO
[5]  
Bjerrum L., 1973, Proceedings, Eighth International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, V3, P111
[6]  
Blackburn J.T., 2005, PhD Thesis
[7]   30TH RANKINE LECTURE - ON THE COMPRESSIBILITY AND SHEAR-STRENGTH OF NATURAL CLAYS [J].
BURLAND, JB .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1990, 40 (03) :329-378
[8]   Mechanical behaviour of a natural soft clay [J].
Callisto, L ;
Calabresi, G .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1998, 48 (04) :495-513
[9]  
Chan C.K., 1981, Geotech. Test. J, V4, P183, DOI DOI 10.1520/GTJ10788J
[10]  
Cho W., 2007, THESIS NW U EVANSTON