Superconductivity in the Tl-based cuprates encompasses a notably broad range of measured optimal transition temperatures T-C0, ranging from lowest in the charge-depleted Tl-1201 compounds (Tl1-x(Ba/Sr)(1+y)La1-yCuO5-delta), such as Tl0.7LaSrCuO5 (37 K) and TlBa1.2La0.8CuO5 (45.4 K), to highest in the Tl-1223 compound TlBa2Ca2Cu3O9 +/-delta (133.5 K). Seven Tl-based cuprates are considered and compared using the model of superconductive pairing via electronic interactions between two physically separated charge reservoirs, where T-C0 proportional to(sigma eta/A)(1/2)zeta(-1) is determined by the superconducting interaction charge fraction sigma, the number eta of CuO2 layers, and the basal-plane area A, each per formula unit, and the transverse distance zeta between interacting layers. Herein it is demonstrated that sigma follows from the elemental electronegativity and the oxidation state of Tl, and other structurally analogous cations. The comparatively lower elemental electronegativity of Tl, in conjunction with its oxidation state, explains the higher sigma and T-C0 values in the Tl-based compounds relative to their Bi-based cuprate homologs. A derivation of sigma is introduced for the optimal Tl2Ba2Ca eta-1Cu eta O2n+4 (for eta=1, 2, 3) compounds, which exhibit a Tl oxidation state at or near +3, obtaining the fundamental value sigma(0)=0.228 previously established for YBa2Cu3O6.92. Also reported is the marked enhancement in sigma associated with Tl+1 and analogous inner-layer cations relative to higher-valence cations. For a model proposition of sigma=sigma(0), the fractional Tl+1 content of the mixed-valence compound, TlBa2Ca2Cu3O9 +/-delta, is predicted to be 1/3 at optimization, in agreement with existing data. Charge depletion is illustrated for the two Tl-1201 compounds, where sigma < sigma(0) values are determined according to substitution of Ba+2 or Sr+2 by La+3, and/or Tl depletion. Additionally, statistical analysis of calculated and experimental transition temperatures of 48 optimal superconductors shows an absence of bias in determining sigma, A, and zeta. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.