EFFECT OF THREE ENDODONTIC SEALERS ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF PREFABRICATED FIBER POSTS LUTED WITH THREE RESIN CEMENTS

被引:20
作者
Aleisa, Khalil [2 ]
Alghabban, Rawda [3 ,4 ]
Alwazzan, Khalid [2 ]
Morgano, Steven M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Henry M Goldman Sch Dent Med, Div Postdoctoral Prosthodont, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Riyadh Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Riyadh Coll Pharm, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
ROOT-CANAL SEALERS; TEMPORARY CEMENTS; COMPOSITE RESIN; IN-VITRO; RETENTIVE STRENGTH; FINITE-ELEMENT; CAST POSTS; EUGENOL; DENTIN; DOWELS;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60084-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. There is limited information in the literature regarding the effect of eugenol-based sealers on the bond strength of resin-bonded endodontic posts. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 1 resin-based and 2 different eugenol-based endodontic sealers on the bond strength of prefabricated fiber posts luted with 3 different resin cements. Material and methods. One hundred thirty-five prefabricated fiber posts were luted into extracted single-rooted teeth with 1 of 3 composite resin cements (Rely X Unicem, Paracore, and Variolink II). Specimens were divided into 3 groups with 45 teeth each. The first 2 groups were obturated with gutta percha and 1 of 2 eugenol-based endodontic sealers (Endofil, Tubli-Seal). The third group was obturated with a resin-based root canal sealer (AH26). The forces required for dislodgment of posts from their prepared post spaces were recorded by using a universal testing machine. Data were collected and a 2-way ANOVA was applied to the mean retentive strengths of various combinations of sealer and cement. A Tukey multiple comparison test was performed to determine which groups were significantly different (alpha=.05). Results. Endofil and Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based sealers) groups had significantly lower bond strengths for the posts than the AH26 group (P<.001). There was no significant difference between the means of post bond strength for the Endofil and Tubli-Seal groups. There was significant difference among the means of post bond strength for all 3 cement groups (P<.05). Conclusions. Endofil and Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based) sealers demonstrated significantly reduced mean bond strength for prefabricated fiber posts luted with resin cement. Rely X Unicem resin cement exhibited higher mean bond strength than with Paracore and Variolink II resin cements when a eugenol sealer was used. (J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:322-326)
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 326
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin [J].
Abo-Hamar, SE ;
Federlin, M ;
Hitter, KA ;
Friedl, KH ;
Schmalz, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (09) :794-803
[2]  
Al-Ali K, 2003, INT J PROSTHODONT, V16, P290
[3]   Effect of eugenol-based root canal sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts luted with resin cement [J].
Al-Ali, Khalil .
SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2009, 21 (02) :69-73
[4]   In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth [J].
Al-harbi, F ;
Nathanson, D .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (06) :547-555
[5]  
al-Wazzan K A, 1997, J Prosthodont, V6, P37
[6]   EFFECTS OF ENDODONTIC POST SURFACE TREATMENT, DENTIN CONDITIONING, AND ARTIFICIAL AGING ON THE RETENTION OF GLASS FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN POSTS [J].
Albashaireh, Zakereyya S. ;
Ghazal, Muhamad ;
Kern, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 103 (01) :31-39
[7]   Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts [J].
Asmussen, E ;
Peutzfeldt, A ;
Heitmann, T .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (04) :275-278
[8]   RETENTION OF DOWELS USING A COMPOSITE RESIN AS A CEMENTING MEDIUM [J].
ASSIF, D ;
FERBER, A .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 48 (03) :292-296
[9]   Fibre-based post systems: a review [J].
Bateman, G ;
Ricketts, DNJ ;
Saunders, WP .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 195 (01) :43-48
[10]   Post retention: The effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers [J].
Boone, KJ ;
Murchison, DF ;
Schindler, WG ;
Walker, WA .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2001, 27 (12) :768-771