Electrical Compensation for Magnetization Distortion of Magnetic Fluxgate Current Sensor

被引:3
作者
Wei, Yutong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Cheng [1 ]
Zhao, Wenlei [1 ]
Xue, Mingyu [4 ]
Cao, Bin [4 ]
Chu, Xu [4 ]
Ye, Chaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] ShanghaiTech Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Shanghai 201210, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Microsyst & Informat Technol, Shanghai 200050, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co Ltd, Shanghai 201815, Peoples R China
关键词
Feedback control; fluxgate sensor; magnetization distortion compensation; nonlinear magnetic core; precise current measurement; NOISE;
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2022.3152861
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Current sensors based on the fluxgate magnetic field meter and feedback zero-field operating principle have excellent current measurement accuracy and linearity in a large range of up to thousands of amperes. An excitation current (I-e) is employed in a magnetic fluxgate sensor to magnetize the magnetic core periodically, which will generate magnetization distortion that affects the performance of the sensor. This article proposes a novel scheme for suppressing the magnetization distortion through electrical compensation. The source of the magnetization distortion is theoretically derived and analyzed. It is found that the magnetization distortion is a function of the excitation current Ie and is not affected by the primary current. Since Ie is a periodical current that is determined by the parameters of the sensor itself, it is feasible to inject a specified periodical current to the output port of the sensor to cancel the magnetization distortion. Compared with the magnetization distortion compensation method with an additional core and coil, this method does not need to pair the cores or coils, which significantly reduces the complexity of the production process and saves space for the sensor. A prototype sensor with electrical compensation is designed, fabricated, and tested. Experimental results show that the compensation setting significantly suppresses the magnetization distortion signal. The amplitude of the basic frequency component is reduced from 24 to 6.8 mu V. The other odd harmonics of the magnetization distortion are also reduced. The electrical compensation method works properly in a large current range from -1.5 to 1.5 kA. The scale accuracy of the prototype sensor is less than 5.7 ppm (parts per million). The compensation method can suppress the magnetization distortion to a similar level with operating temperature changes from room temperature to 50 degrees C.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A Low-Noise Fundamental-Mode Orthogonal Fluxgate Magnetometer
    Bazinet, Robert
    Jacas, Alfredo
    Badini Confalonieri, Giovanni A.
    Vazquez, Manuel
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2014, 50 (05)
  • [2] Low-Noise Orthogonal Fluxgate Using Flipped Current Joule Annealing
    Butta, Mattia
    Schutte, Byron P.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2019, 55 (07)
  • [3] Guillot F., 2018, Patent,, Patent No. [WO 2018/115 032A1, 2018115032]
  • [4] Noise spectrum of pulse excited fluxgate sensor
    Kubik, Jan
    Ripka, Pavel
    [J]. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2006, 132 (01) : 236 - 240
  • [5] Noise analysis and improvement of a micro-electro-mechanical-systems fluxgate sensor
    Lei, Chong
    Sun, Xue-Cheng
    Zhou, Yong
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2018, 122 : 1 - 5
  • [6] Suppression of magnetic noise in the fundamental-mode orthogonal fluxgate
    Paperno, E
    [J]. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2004, 116 (03) : 405 - 409
  • [7] Noise Optimization of Racetrack Fluxgate Sensors
    Piel, Rainer
    Ludwig, Frank
    Schilling, Meinhard
    [J]. SENSOR LETTERS, 2009, 7 (03) : 317 - 321
  • [8] Wide Range Low Noise Current Sensor
    Richter, F.
    Sourkounis, C.
    [J]. 2008 13TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1398 - 1401
  • [9] Ripka P, 2002, IEEE IMTC P, P677, DOI 10.1109/IMTC.2002.1006923
  • [10] Fluxgate: Tuned vs. untuned output
    Ripka, P
    Billingsley, SW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1998, 34 (04) : 1303 - 1305