Learning main drivers of crop progress and failure in Europe with interpretable machine learning

被引:17
作者
Mateo-Sanchis, Anna [1 ]
Piles, Maria [1 ]
Amoros-Lopez, Julia [1 ]
Munoz-Mari, Jordi [1 ]
Adsuara, Jose E. [1 ]
Moreno-Martinez, Alvaro [1 ]
Camps-Valls, Gustau [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Image Proc Lab IPL, Parc Cient,C Catedrat Jose Beltran 2, Valencia 46980, Spain
关键词
Crop Yield Estimation; Interpretability; Optical and Passive Microwave sensors; MODIS; ERAS-Land; Gaussian Process; Machine Learning; VEGETATION OPTICAL DEPTH; WEATHER; IMPACTS; SYSTEM; YIELDS; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2021.102574
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
A wide variety of methods exist nowadays to address the important problem of estimating crop yields from available remote sensing and climate data. Among the different approaches, machine learning (ML) techniques are being increasingly adopted, since they allow exploiting all the information on crop progress and environmental conditions and their relations with crop yield, achieving reliable and accurate estimations. However, interpreting the relationships learned by the ML models, and hence getting insights about the problem, remains a complex and usually unexplored task. Without accountability, confidence and trust in the ML models can be compromised. Here, we develop interpretable ML approaches for crop yield estimation that allow us investigating the most informative agro-ecological drivers and influencial regions learned by the models. We conduct a set of experiments to learn the selection of agro-ecological drivers leading to best estimations of main crops grown in Europe: corn, barley and wheat. As input data, we consider a variety of multi-scale Earth observation products sensitive to canopy greenness (e.g. EVI and LAI), its water-uptake dynamics (e.g. VOD) and available water (soil moisture), as well as climatic variables from the ERA5-Land reanalysis (e.g. temperature and radiation). Our results show that the best performances (R-2>0.55 for corn and R-2 >0.8 for both barley and wheat) are obtained when descriptors of soil, vegetation, and atmosphere status are used as input in the ML models. This combination of variables outperforms the results obtained using single variables as inputs or all variables altogether. We then further analyze the relations of input features with crop yield in the developed models by means of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). We show how the information learned by the GPR model allows us to identify atypical or anomalous crop seasons across the study region, and investigate the underlying factors behind crop progress and failure in Europe.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Interpretable Machine Learning for Discovery: Statistical Challenges and Opportunities [J].
Allen, Genevera I. ;
Gan, Luqin ;
Zheng, Lili .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2024, 11 :97-121
[22]   AIMLAI: Advances in Interpretable Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence [J].
Bibal, Adrien ;
Bouadi, Tassadit ;
Frenay, Benoit ;
Galarraga, Luis ;
Oramas, Jose .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2022, 2022, :5160-5160
[23]   Toward Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Materials Discovery [J].
Mikulskis, Paulius ;
Alexander, Morgan R. ;
Winkler, David Alan .
ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 1 (08)
[24]   Interpretable machine learning approaches to prediction of chronic homelessness [J].
VanBerlo, Blake ;
Ross, Matthew A. S. ;
Rivard, Jonathan ;
Booker, Ryan .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 102
[25]   Interpretable Machine Learning Tools: A Survey [J].
Agarwal, Namita ;
Das, Saikat .
2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, :1528-1534
[26]   An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach for Hepatitis B Diagnosis [J].
Obaido, George ;
Ogbuokiri, Blessing ;
Swart, Theo G. ;
Ayawei, Nimibofa ;
Kasongo, Sydney Mambwe ;
Aruleba, Kehinde ;
Mienye, Ibomoiye Domor ;
Aruleba, Idowu ;
Chukwu, Williams ;
Osaye, Fadekemi ;
Egbelowo, Oluwaseun F. ;
Simphiwe, Simelane ;
Esenogho, Ebenezer .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (21)
[27]   Interpretable machine learning for imbalanced credit scoring datasets [J].
Chen, Yujia ;
Calabrese, Raffaella ;
Martin-Barragan, Belen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 312 (01) :357-372
[28]   An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach for Laser Lifetime Prediction [J].
Abdelli, Khouloud ;
Griesser, Helmut ;
Pachnicke, Stephan .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (06) :2094-2102
[29]   Progress Toward Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Disruption Predictors Across Tokamaks [J].
Rea, C. ;
Montes, K. J. ;
Pau, A. ;
Granetz, R. S. ;
Sauter, O. .
FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 76 (08) :912-924
[30]   A physics-supervised interpretable machine learning approach for seismic failure modes prediction of RC columns [J].
Cheng H. ;
Yu Z. ;
Yu B. .
Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44 (11) :69-79