Learning main drivers of crop progress and failure in Europe with interpretable machine learning

被引:17
|
作者
Mateo-Sanchis, Anna [1 ]
Piles, Maria [1 ]
Amoros-Lopez, Julia [1 ]
Munoz-Mari, Jordi [1 ]
Adsuara, Jose E. [1 ]
Moreno-Martinez, Alvaro [1 ]
Camps-Valls, Gustau [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Image Proc Lab IPL, Parc Cient,C Catedrat Jose Beltran 2, Valencia 46980, Spain
关键词
Crop Yield Estimation; Interpretability; Optical and Passive Microwave sensors; MODIS; ERAS-Land; Gaussian Process; Machine Learning; VEGETATION OPTICAL DEPTH; WEATHER; IMPACTS; SYSTEM; YIELDS; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2021.102574
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
A wide variety of methods exist nowadays to address the important problem of estimating crop yields from available remote sensing and climate data. Among the different approaches, machine learning (ML) techniques are being increasingly adopted, since they allow exploiting all the information on crop progress and environmental conditions and their relations with crop yield, achieving reliable and accurate estimations. However, interpreting the relationships learned by the ML models, and hence getting insights about the problem, remains a complex and usually unexplored task. Without accountability, confidence and trust in the ML models can be compromised. Here, we develop interpretable ML approaches for crop yield estimation that allow us investigating the most informative agro-ecological drivers and influencial regions learned by the models. We conduct a set of experiments to learn the selection of agro-ecological drivers leading to best estimations of main crops grown in Europe: corn, barley and wheat. As input data, we consider a variety of multi-scale Earth observation products sensitive to canopy greenness (e.g. EVI and LAI), its water-uptake dynamics (e.g. VOD) and available water (soil moisture), as well as climatic variables from the ERA5-Land reanalysis (e.g. temperature and radiation). Our results show that the best performances (R-2>0.55 for corn and R-2 >0.8 for both barley and wheat) are obtained when descriptors of soil, vegetation, and atmosphere status are used as input in the ML models. This combination of variables outperforms the results obtained using single variables as inputs or all variables altogether. We then further analyze the relations of input features with crop yield in the developed models by means of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). We show how the information learned by the GPR model allows us to identify atypical or anomalous crop seasons across the study region, and investigate the underlying factors behind crop progress and failure in Europe.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Algorithms for Interpretable Machine Learning
    Rudin, Cynthia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING (KDD'14), 2014, : 1519 - 1519
  • [2] Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for an Advanced Crop Recommendation Model
    Bouni, Mohamed
    Hssina, Badr
    Douzi, Khadija
    Douzi, Samira
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2024, 2024
  • [3] Quantifying the drivers of residential housing demand - an interpretable machine learning approach
    Cajias, Marcelo
    Zeitler, Joseph-Alexander
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN REAL ESTATE RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (02) : 172 - 199
  • [4] A Survey of Interpretable Machine Learning Methods
    Wang, Yan
    Tuerhong, Gulanbaier
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY, HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VRHCIAI, 2022, : 232 - 237
  • [5] Interpretable machine learning for weather and climate prediction: A review
    Yang, Ruyi
    Hu, Jingyu
    Li, Zihao
    Mu, Jianli
    Yu, Tingzhao
    Xia, Jiangjiang
    Li, Xuhong
    Dasgupta, Aritra
    Xiong, Haoyi
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 338
  • [6] Interpretable machine learning for materials design
    James Dean
    Matthias Scheffler
    Thomas A. R. Purcell
    Sergey V. Barabash
    Rahul Bhowmik
    Timur Bazhirov
    Journal of Materials Research, 2023, 38 : 4477 - 4496
  • [7] Interpretable machine learning for materials design
    Dean, James
    Scheffler, Matthias
    Purcell, Thomas A. R.
    Barabash, Sergey V.
    Bhowmik, Rahul
    Bazhirov, Timur
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2023, 38 (20) : 4477 - 4496
  • [8] Machine learning for regional crop yield forecasting in Europe
    Paudel, Dilli
    Boogaard, Hendrik
    de Wit, Allard
    van der Velde, Marijn
    Claverie, Martin
    Nisini, Luigi
    Janssen, Sander
    Osinga, Sjoukje
    Athanasiadis, Ioannis N.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 276
  • [9] A critical moment in machine learning in medicine: on reproducible and interpretable learning
    Ciobanu-Caraus, Olga
    Aicher, Anatol
    Kernbach, Julius M.
    Regli, Luca
    Serra, Carlo
    Staartjes, Victor E.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [10] Interpretable machine learning assessment
    Han, Henry
    Wu, Yi
    Wang, Jiacun
    Han, Ashley
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2023, 561