Development of a species-specific PCR coupled with lateral flow immunoassay for the identification of goose ingredient in foods

被引:12
作者
Zhao, Liangjuan [1 ]
Li, Shenmiao [2 ]
Hua, Marti Z. [2 ]
Liu, Jinyu [1 ]
Zhang, Hongwei [3 ]
Hu, Yaxi [2 ,4 ]
Chen, Ying [5 ]
Lu, Xiaonan [2 ,4 ]
Zheng, Wenjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Normal Univ, Tianjin Key Lab Anim & Plant Resistance, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Food Nutr & Hlth Program, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[3] Anim & Plant & Foodstuffs Inspect Ctr Tianjin Cus, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[4] Univ British Columbia, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
[5] Chinese Acad Inspect & Quarantine, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PCR; Lateral flow assay; Goose ingredient; Food authentication; Food fraud; REAL-TIME PCR; MEAT-PRODUCTS; DUCK; DNA; AUTHENTICITY; CHICKEN; TURKEY; ASSAY; PORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107240
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Meat authenticity testing along food supply chain can be largely improved through fast and integrated DNA-based identification methods. A species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) was developed for the identification of goose meat. The goose-specific primers that could specifically enrich a fragment on mitochondrial 12s RNA gene were successfully designed. The specificity of the primers was verified against 19 other species associated with meat fraud. The proposed PCR-LFI device was able to detect 0.01% (w/w) of goose in uncooked binary mixtures and 0.1% (w/w) in cooked binary mixtures. The LFI strip as a post-PCR visualization method was more sensitive and faster than gel electrophoresis method. Eight collaborative laboratories verified the reproducibility of fabrication and detection protocols of the developed LFI. This PCR-LFI method has great potential to be used as a fast and cost-efficient counter-measure for food industry and other regulatory bodies to reduce the possibility of fraud of goose products.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Analytical methods used for the authentication of food of animal origin [J].
Abbas, Ouissam ;
Zadravec, Manuela ;
Baeten, Vincent ;
Mikus, Tomislav ;
Lesic, Tina ;
Vulic, Ana ;
Prpic, Jelena ;
Jemersic, Lorena ;
Pleadin, Jelka .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2018, 246 :6-17
[2]  
Amaral J, 2016, WOODHEAD PUBL FOOD S, P369, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100220-9.00014-X
[3]   Authenticity of meat products: Tools against fraud [J].
Angel Sentandreu, Miguel ;
Sentandreu, Enrique .
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 60 :19-29
[4]  
Arvanitoyannis I S., 2016, Authenticity of Foods of Animal Origin
[5]   Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [J].
Asensio, Luis ;
Gonzalez, Isabel ;
Garcia, Teresa ;
Martin, Rosario .
FOOD CONTROL, 2008, 19 (01) :1-8
[6]   Authentication of meat and meat products [J].
Ballin, N. Z. .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2010, 86 (03) :577-587
[7]   Consumers' confidence, reflections and response strategies following the horsemeat incident [J].
Barnett, J. ;
Begen, F. ;
Howes, S. ;
Regan, A. ;
McConnon, A. ;
Marcu, A. ;
Rowntree, S. ;
Verbeke, W. .
FOOD CONTROL, 2016, 59 :721-730
[8]   Studies on adulteration of goose foie gras assessed in the years 2015 and 2016 in Hungary - case reports [J].
Bognar, L. ;
Helik, F. ;
Izso, T. ;
Kasza, G. .
EUROPEAN POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 82
[9]  
Cai M., 2017, XINHUANEWS
[10]   Identification of the goose species (Anser anser) in Italian "Mortara" salami by DNA sequencing and a Polymerase Chain Reaction with an original primer pair [J].
Colombo, F ;
Marchisio, E ;
Pizzini, A ;
Cantoni, C .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2002, 61 (03) :291-294