Victorian Lung Cancer Service Redesign Project: impacts of a quality improvement collaborative on timeliness and management in lung cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Largey, Geraldine [1 ]
Briggs, Peter [1 ]
Davies, Heather [1 ]
Underhill, Craig [6 ]
Ross, Cara [6 ]
Harvey, Kellie [2 ]
Blum, Robert [7 ]
Parker, Carol [7 ]
Guthrie, Christal [7 ]
Parente, Phillip [3 ]
Trevorah, Brooke [3 ]
Torres, Javier [8 ]
Mott, Carole [8 ]
Lancaster, Cheryl [8 ]
Brand, Margaret [4 ]
Earnest, Arul [4 ]
Pellegrini, Breanna [4 ]
Reed, Marita [5 ]
Zalcberg, John [4 ]
Stirling, Rob [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Southern Melbourne Integrated Canc Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Resp Med, Alfred Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Eastern Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Dept Hlth & Human Serv Qual & Canc Outcomes, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Albury Wodonga Hlth, Dept Border Med Oncol, Wodonga, Australia
[7] Bendigo Hlth Care Grp, Dept Med Oncol, Bendigo, Australia
[8] Goulbourn Valley Hlth, Dept Med Oncol, Shepparton, Vic, Australia
关键词
lung cancer; quality; improvement; collaborative; CARE; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/imj.15043
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lung cancer management is characterised by a high disease burden, poor survival and substantial variation in management and outcomes. Service redesign provides opportunities for quality improvement (QI) and this improvement may be leveraged across multiple sites using QI collaboration. Aim This initiative targeted Quality Improvement (QI) in lung cancer management, engaging a QI collaborative using service redesign methodologies in five Victorian hospitals. QI targets included timeliness from referral and diagnosis to treatment, multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) presentation and supportive care screening. Redesign strategies targeted process sustainability through enhanced team capability. Methods This study engaged a prospective quality improvement cohort design targeting newly diagnosed tissue confirmed lung cancer with 6-month pre-intervention period and 6-month redesign implementation period, between September 2016 and August 2017, evaluated using Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Hospital sites included three regional and two metropolitan hospitals in Victoria. QI redesign targeted time intervals from referral to first specialist appointment (FSA), referral to diagnosis, diagnosis to first treatment (any intent), MDM documented in medical records and Supportive Care Screening Tool documented in medical records. Results There was a marked reduction in referral to FSA interval across all sites, with median (interquartile range) falling from 6 (0-15) to 4 (1-10) days, and proportion seen by a specialist within 14 days increased from 74.3% to 84.2%. The interval between diagnosis and treatment was not substantively changed in the 6-month implementation period. The proportion of subjects with documented presentation to the MDM increased from 61% to 67%. The proportion for which Supportive Care Screening documentation remained low at 26.3% post-intervention. Conclusions Data-driven redesign initiatives enable identification and analysis of clinical practice variation and may be utilised to enhance timeliness of cancer care and improve local data service capabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:2061 / 2068
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effect of Timeliness of Care on Lung Cancer Survival - A Population-Based Approach
    Guerreiro, Teresa
    Mayer, Alexandra
    Aguiar, Pedro
    Araujo, Antonio
    Nunes, Carla
    ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 89 (01):
  • [22] No improvement in lung cancer care: the management of lung cancer in 1996 and 2002 in New South Wales
    Simonella, L.
    O'Connell, D. L.
    Vinod, S. K.
    Delaney, G. P.
    Boyer, M.
    Esmaili, N.
    Hensley, M.
    Goldsbury, D.
    Supramaniam, R.
    Hui, A.
    Armstrong, B.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 39 (07) : 453 - 458
  • [23] Timeliness of lung cancer care in Victoria: a retrospective cohort study
    Evans, Sue M.
    Earnest, Arul
    Bower, Wendy
    Senthuren, Meera
    McLaughlin, Peta
    Stirling, Rob
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 204 (02) : 75.e1 - 75.e9
  • [24] Hospital Characteristics Associated with Timeliness of Care in Veterans with Lung Cancer
    Schultz, Ellen M.
    Powell, Adam A.
    McMillan, Alex
    Olsson, Julie K.
    Enderle, Mark A.
    Graham, Barry A.
    Ordin, Diana L.
    Gould, Michael K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179 (07) : 595 - 600
  • [25] Quality Indicators for the Evaluation of Patients With Lung Cancer
    Mazzone, Peter J.
    Vachani, Anil
    Chang, Andrew
    Detterbeck, Frank
    Cooke, David
    Howington, John
    Dodi, Amos
    Arenberg, Douglas
    CHEST, 2014, 146 (03) : 659 - 669
  • [26] National trends in the quality of segmentectomy for lung cancer
    Logan, Charles D.
    Jacobs, Ryan C.
    Feinglass, Joe
    Lung, Kalvin
    Kim, Samuel
    Bharat, Ankit
    Odell, David D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (01): : 351 - +
  • [27] Ageism in the management of lung cancer
    Peake, MD
    Thompson, S
    Lowe, D
    Pearson, MG
    AGE AND AGEING, 2003, 32 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [28] QUALITY IN LUNG CANCER CARE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POPULATION BASED LUNG CANCER REGISTRY
    Stirling, Robert
    Mclaughlin, Peta
    Senthuren, Meera
    Evans, Sue
    Watkins, Neil
    Mcneil, John
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S994 - S995
  • [29] The Interdisciplinary Management of Lung Cancer in the European Community
    Bertolaccini, Luca
    Mohamed, Shehab
    Bardoni, Claudia
    Lo Iacono, Giorgio
    Mazzella, Antonio
    Guarize, Juliana
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (15)
  • [30] Delays for lung cancer treatment: Performance with respect to timeliness and increase of investigations
    Pujol, J. -L.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2014, 31 (03) : 198 - 202