Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Parmar, Nidhi P. [1 ]
Thompson, Gabrielle L. [1 ]
Atack, Nikki E. [1 ]
Ireland, Anthony J. [1 ]
Sherriff, Martyn [1 ]
Haworth, Jennifer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Dent Sch, Lower Maudlin St, Bristol BS1 2LY, Avon, England
关键词
systematic review; self-ligating bracket; conventional bracket; microbial colonisation; fixed orthodontic appliance; randomised controlled trial; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; PERIODONTAL STATUS; ORAL HYGIENE; PARAMETERS; HALITOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/14653125211056023
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Decalcification and gingivitis caused by plaque accumulation around brackets are common iatrogenic effects of fixed appliances. The influence of conventional versus self-ligating bracket design on microbial colonisation is unknown. Objective: To assess the levels of microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Search sources: Three databases were searched for publications from 2009 to 2021. Data selection: Randomised controlled trials comparing levels of microbial colonisation before and during treatment with conventional and self-ligating brackets were assessed independently and in duplicate. Data extraction: Data were extracted independently by two authors from the studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessments were made using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist. Results: A total of 11 randomised controlled trials were included in this systematic review. Six of the studies were found to be at low risk of bias and five presented with some concerns. The studies were considered moderate to high quality. Five trials reported no statistically significant difference in microbial colonisation between bracket types. The remaining studies showed mixed results, with some reporting increased colonisation of conventional brackets and others increased colonisation of self-ligating brackets. The heterogeneity of study methods and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Conclusion: Of the 11 studies included in this systematic review, five found no differences in colonisation between conventional and self-ligating brackets. The remaining studies showed mixed results. The evidence is inconclusive regarding the association between bracket design and levels of microbial colonisation.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 162
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The Effect of Orthodontic Therapy on Periodontal Health: A Review of the Literature [J].
Alfuriji, Samah ;
Alhazmi, Nora ;
Alhamlan, Nasir ;
Al-Ehaideb, Ali ;
Alruwaithi, Moatazbellah ;
Alkatheeri, Nasser ;
Geevarghese, Amrita .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2014, 2014
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CRITICAL APPRAISAL S
[3]  
Arora Nupur, 2014, J Indian Soc Periodontol, V18, P9, DOI 10.4103/0972-124X.128192
[4]   Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review [J].
Atack, NE ;
Sandy, JR ;
Addy, M .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 67 (02) :78-85
[5]   Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: A quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction [J].
Baka, Zeliha Muge ;
Basciftci, Faruk Ayhan ;
Arslan, Ugur .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 144 (02) :260-267
[6]   Studying the human oral microbiome: challenges and the evolution of solutions [J].
Benn, A. M. L. ;
Heng, N. C. K. ;
Broadbent, J. M. ;
Thomson, W. M. .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2018, 63 (01) :14-24
[7]  
Borenstein M, 2009, Introduction to Meta-Analysis
[8]  
BOYD RL, 1992, ANGLE ORTHOD, V62, P117
[9]  
British Orthodontic Society, 2021, ZOOM BOOM BOS STATS
[10]  
British Orthodontic Society, 2021, WHY ORTH