A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, retrospective comparison of 5-and 10-day regimens of levofloxacin in a subgroup of patients aged ≥65 years with community-acquired pneumonia

被引:31
|
作者
Shorr, AF
Zadeikis, N
Xiang, JX
Tennenberg, AM
Ely, EW
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med Serv, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Ortho McNeil Pharmaceut Inc, Raritan, NJ USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Tennessee Valley Ctr Aging, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Div Pulm Crit Care & Allergy, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
community-acquired pneumonia; elderly; levofloxacin; outcomes;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(05)80214-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: This subgroup analysis sought to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a 5-day regimen of levofloxacin 750 mg/d compared with a 10-day regimen of levofloxacin 500 mg/d in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients (aged >= 65 years). Methods: This subgroup analysis was based on the outcomes in patients aged >= 65 years from a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial conducted at 70 US centers. Patients in Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) class I/II and III/IV were randomized to receive levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days or levofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days. Study investigators assessed clinical and microbiologic outcomes 7 to 14 days after administration of the last dose of medication and collected adverse events for 30 days after the last dose. Results: This analysis included 177 elderly patients, 80 receiving levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days and 97 receiving levofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days. Although most demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups, the group that received levofloxacin 500 mg/d was older than the group that received levofloxacin 750 mg/d (median age, 76.0 vs 72.5 years, respectively; P = 0.029) and had a higher mean PSI score (90.7 vs 83.1; P = 0.017). Despite the halved duration of therapy, unadjusted clinical success rates were comparable between the 2 groups (89.0% and 91.9% in the 750- and 500-mg arms, respectively; 95% CI, -7.1 to 12.7). Microbiologic eradication rates were 90.3% (28/31) in the 750-mg arm and 87.5% (14/16) in the 500-mg arm (P = NS). Multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline PSI score indicated that treatment assignment was not statistically associated with clinical success (adjusted odds ratio for clinical success with 500-mg dose, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.62 to 5.99). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ between the 2 study treatments. The most common adverse events in both groups were insomnia, constipation, and headache. Conclusions: This subgroup analysis found that levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days was well tolerated in the treatment of CAP in elderly patients. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of clinical success were statistically similar between levofloxacin 750 mg/d for 5 days and lcvofloxacin 500 mg/d for 10 days.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1259
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: results from a double-blind randomized phase 3 comparison study with levofloxacin
    Bergallo, Carlos
    Jasovich, Abet
    Teglia, Osvaldo
    Eugenia Oliva, Maria
    Lentnek, Arnold
    de Wouters, Luisa
    Zlocowski, Juan Carlos
    Dukart, Gary
    Cooper, Angel
    Mallick, Rajiv
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2009, 63 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [2] Randomized, double-blind study comparing 5-and 7-day regimens of oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
    Masterton, RG
    Burley, CJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2001, 18 (06) : 503 - 512
  • [3] A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter comparison of parenteral ertapenem and ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia
    Vetter, N
    Cambronero-Hernandez, E
    Rohlf, J
    Simon, S
    Carides, A
    Oliveria, T
    Isaacs, R
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) : 1770 - 1785
  • [4] A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Gotfried, MH
    Dattani, D
    Riffer, E
    Devcich, KJ
    Busman, TA
    Notario, GF
    Palmer, RN
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (05) : 736 - 751
  • [5] A randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral nemonoxacin with oral levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Yingyuan
    Wu, Jufang
    Zhu, Demei
    Sun, Shenghua
    Zhao, Li
    Wang, Xuefeng
    Liu, Hua
    Ren, Zhenyi
    Wang, Changzheng
    Xiu, Qingyu
    Xiao, Zuke
    Cao, Zhaolong
    Cui, Shehuai
    Yang, Heping
    Liang, Yongjie
    Chen, Ping
    Lv, Yuan
    Hu, Chengping
    Lv, Xiaoju
    Liu, Shuang
    Kuang, Jiulong
    Li, Jianguo
    Wang, Dexi
    Chang, Liwen
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 50 (06) : 811 - 820
  • [6] Oral empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia - A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing sparfloxacin with roxithromycin
    Ortqvist, A
    Valtonen, M
    Cars, O
    Wahl, M
    Saikku, P
    Jean, C
    Holmen, C
    Werner, M
    Stenlund, G
    Danielsson, A
    Hagberg, L
    Nilsson, BO
    Nystrom, G
    Augustinsson, A
    Otto, G
    Ljungstrom, L
    Boman, H
    Hebelka, M
    Odenholdt, I
    Schonbeck, C
    Hjalt, CA
    Leinonen, M
    Harno, K
    Kyronseppa, H
    Mattson, K
    Sammalkorpi, K
    Riska, H
    Kuha, R
    Kiukaanniemi, H
    Ringdahl, N
    CHEST, 1996, 110 (06) : 1499 - 1506
  • [7] Cefditoren pivoxil versus cefpodoxime proxetil for community-acquired pneumonia: Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    van Zyl, L
    le Roux, JG
    LaFata, JA
    Volk, RS
    Palo, WA
    Flamm, R
    Hom, RC
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) : 1840 - 1853
  • [8] A prospective, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release with trovafloxacin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
    Sokol, WN
    Sullivan, JG
    Acampora, MD
    Busman, TA
    Notario, GF
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (04) : 605 - 615
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of oral nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Yuan, Jinyi
    Mo, Biwen
    Ma, Zhuang
    Lv, Yuan
    Cheng, Shih-Lung
    Yang, Yanping
    Tong, Zhaohui
    Wu, Renguang
    Sun, Shenghua
    Cao, Zhaolong
    Wu, Jufang
    Zhu, Demei
    Chang, Liwen
    Zhang, Yingyuan
    Zhao, Li
    Wang, Xiongbiao
    Wang, Xuefen
    Wang, Dexi
    Li, Xiangyang
    Peng, Yiqiang
    Liang, Yongjie
    Liu, Hua
    Xiao, Zuke
    Lv, Xiaoju
    Wu, Shiman
    Dai, Yuanrong
    Huang, Yijiang
    Hu, Zhenghong
    Qiu, Chen
    Li, Xi
    Zhang, Suiyang
    Li, Wenpu
    Liu, Shuang
    Shi, Yi
    Xiong, Chang
    Kuang, Jiulong
    Xiu, Qingyu
    Cui, Shehuai
    Li, Jianguo
    Lin, Qichang
    Huang, Wenxiang
    Wan, Yixin
    Li, Qimangu
    Shen, Ce
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Xiaoju
    Chuang, Yin Ching
    Perng, Wann Cherng
    Tsao, Shih-Ming
    Hsu, Jeng-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 52 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [10] Adjunct prednisone in community-acquired pneumonia: 180-day outcome of a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Claudine A. Blum
    Eva A. Roethlisberger
    Nicole Cesana-Nigro
    Bettina Winzeler
    Nicolas Rodondi
    Manuel R. Blum
    Matthias Briel
    Beat Mueller
    Mirjam Christ-Crain
    Philipp Schuetz
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23