Travel Time Prediction and Explanation with Spatio-Temporal Features: A Comparative Study

被引:13
作者
Ahmed, Irfan [1 ,2 ]
Kumara, Indika [1 ,2 ]
Reshadat, Vahideh [3 ]
Kayes, A. S. M. [4 ]
van den Heuvel, Willem-Jan [1 ,2 ]
Tamburri, Damian A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jheronimus Acad Data Sci, Sint Janssingel 92, NL-5211 DA sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Warandelaan 2, NL-5037 AB Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, NL-5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] La Trobe Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Plenty Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
travel time prediction; spatio-temporal; XGBoost; LightGBM; LSTM; hybrid models; Explainable AI; XAI; SHAP and LIME; FREEWAY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/electronics11010106
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Travel time information is used as input or auxiliary data for tasks such as dynamic navigation, infrastructure planning, congestion control, and accident detection. Various data-driven Travel Time Prediction (TTP) methods have been proposed in recent years. One of the most challenging tasks in TTP is developing and selecting the most appropriate prediction algorithm. The existing studies that empirically compare different TTP models only use a few models with specific features. Moreover, there is a lack of research on explaining TTPs made by black-box models. Such explanations can help to tune and apply TTP methods successfully. To fill these gaps in the current TTP literature, using three data sets, we compare three types of TTP methods (ensemble tree-based learning, deep neural networks, and hybrid models) and ten different prediction algorithms overall. Furthermore, we apply XAI (Explainable Artificial Intelligence) methods (SHAP and LIME) to understand and interpret models' predictions. The prediction accuracy and reliability for all models are evaluated and compared. We observed that the ensemble learning methods, i.e., XGBoost and LightGBM, are the best performing models over the three data sets, and XAI methods can adequately explain how various spatial and temporal features influence travel time.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[51]   Urban Link Travel Time Prediction Based on a Gradient Boosting Method Considering Spatiotemporal Correlations [J].
Zhang, Faming ;
Zhu, Xinyan ;
Hu, Tao ;
Guo, Wei ;
Chen, Chen ;
Liu, Lingjia .
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2016, 5 (11)
[52]   Study on Driving Decision-Making Mechanism of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Optimized Support Vector Machine Regression [J].
Zhang, Junyou ;
Liao, Yaping ;
Wang, Shufeng ;
Han, Jian .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (01)
[53]   Short-term traffic flow prediction based on combination model of Xgboost-LightGBM [J].
Zhang Mei ;
Fei Xiang ;
Liu Zhen-hui .
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSOR NETWORKS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (SNSP 2018), 2018, :322-327
[54]   A gradient boosting method to improve travel time prediction [J].
Zhang, Yanru ;
Haghani, Ali .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 58 :308-324
[55]   Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Passenger Travel Patterns in Massive Smart Card Data [J].
Zhao, Juanjuan ;
Qu, Qiang ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Xu, Chengzhong ;
Liu, Siyuan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 18 (11) :3135-3146
[56]   RELATIVE POWER OF THE WILCOXON TEST, THE FRIEDMAN TEST, AND REPEATED-MEASURES ANOVA ON RANKS [J].
ZIMMERMAN, DW ;
ZUMBO, BD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1993, 62 (01) :75-86