Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly

被引:27
作者
Carrier, M
Pellerin, M
Perrault, LP
Hébert, Y
Pagé, P
Cartier, R
Dyrda, I
Pelletier, LC
机构
[1] Montreal Heart Inst, Dept Surg & Med, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02508-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Valve replacement in small aortic root remains a surgical challenge. The objective of this study was to compare results of the 19-mm bioprosthesis with those of larger prostheses in the elderly. Methods. The 443 patients, 70 years of age and older, who underwent aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses were reviewed. Results. There were 93 patients with a mean age of 76 +/- 4 years with implantation of 19-mm prostheses and 350 patients with a mean age of 75 +/- 4 years with larger bioprostheses. Associated aortoplasty was performed in 10 patients (11%) with 19-mm bioprostheses and in 8 patients (2%) with larger bioprostheses (p = 0.001). There were 11 deaths (12%) within 30 days of surgery in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 22 deaths (6%) among those with larger prostheses (p = 0.1). The 7-year survival rate averaged 61% +/- 7% in patients with 19-mm prostheses and 67% +/- 4% in those with larger prostheses (p = 0.8). The 7-year freedom rates from all valve-related events averaged 96% +/- 2% and 93% +/- 2%, respectively [p = 0.6). Conclusions. Aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis offers excellent midterm results in the elderly. (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:S249 / S252
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Does gender matter? [J].
Adams, DH ;
Chen, RH ;
Kadner, A ;
Aranki, SF ;
Allred, EN ;
Cohn, LH .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (05) :815-822
[2]   Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis [J].
Dumesnil, JG ;
LeBlanc, MH ;
Cartier, PC ;
Métras, J ;
Desaulniers, D ;
Doyle, DP ;
Lemieux, MD ;
Raymond, G .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (06) :S130-S133
[3]   Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations [J].
Edmunds, LH ;
Clark, RE ;
Cohn, LH ;
Grunkemeier, GL ;
Miller, C ;
Weisel, RD .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (03) :932-935
[4]   Valve replacement in the small aortic annulus: Prospective randomized trial of St Jude with Medtronic Hall [J].
Fiore, AC ;
Swartz, M ;
Grunkemeier, G ;
Dressler, F ;
Peigh, PS ;
McBride, LR ;
Kaiser, GC ;
Labovitz, AJ ;
Barner, HB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 11 (03) :485-492
[5]  
FRANZEN SF, 1996, J HEART VALVE DIS S3, V5, P284
[6]   Multicenter study of stentless valve replacement in the small aortic root [J].
Hvass, U ;
Palatianos, GM ;
Frassani, R ;
Puricelli, C ;
O'Brien, M .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 117 (02) :267-271
[7]   Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses [J].
Izzat, MB ;
Kadir, I ;
Reeves, B ;
Wilde, P ;
Bryan, AJ ;
Angelini, GD .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (05) :1657-1660
[8]   Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement [J].
Khan, SS ;
Siegel, RJ ;
DeRobertis, MA ;
Blanche, CE ;
Kass, RM ;
Cheng, W ;
Fontana, GP ;
Trento, A .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (02) :531-535
[9]   Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve - Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses [J].
Pibarot, P ;
Dumesnil, JG ;
Jobin, J ;
Cartier, P ;
Honos, G ;
Durand, LG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (05) :1609-1617
[10]  
Pibarot P, 1998, J HEART VALVE DIS, V7, P211