Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study

被引:16
|
作者
Li, Jun [1 ]
Li, Hao [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [1 ]
Wang, Zhi-wei [1 ]
Zhao, Teng-fei [1 ]
Chen, Lin-wei [1 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
Chen, Qi-xin [1 ]
Li, Fang-cai [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Orthped, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LLIF; lumbar; spinal stenosis; indirect decompression; Radiographical outcomes; Clinical outcomes; INDIRECT NEURAL DECOMPRESSION; SUBSIDENCE; CAGES;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-020-03282-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Extreme lumbar spinal stenosis was thought to be a relative contraindication for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and was excluded in most studies. This is a retrospective study to analyze the radiographic and clinical outcome of LLIF for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D. Methods For radiographic analysis, we included 181 segments from 110 patients who underwent LLIF between June 2017 and December 2018. Lumbar spinal stenosis was graded according to Schizas' classification. Anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, foramen height, spinal canal diameter and central canal area were measured on CT and MRI. For clinical analysis, 18 patients with at least one segment of grade D were included. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate clinical outcome. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test, with P-values < 0.05 considered to indicate statistically significant differences. Results Among the 181 segments included for radiological evaluation, there were 23 grade A segments, 37 grade B segments, 103 grade C segments and 18 grade D segments. Postoperatively, the average change of midsagittal canal diameter of grade D was significantly greater than that of grade A, and not significantly different compared to grades B and C. As to the average change of disc height, bilateral foraminal height, disc angle and central canal area (CCA), grade D was not significantly different from the others. The average postoperative CCA of grade D was significantly smaller than the average preoperative CCA of grade C. Eighteen patients with grade D stenosis were followed up for an average of 19.61 +/- 6.32 months. Clinical evaluation revealed an average improvement in the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain by 20.77%, 3.67 and 4.15 points, respectively. Sixteen of 18 segments with grade D underwent posterior decompression. Conclusion The radiographic decompression effect of LLIF for Schizas grade D segments was comparable with that of other grades. Posterior decompression was necessary for LLIF to achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study
    Jun Li
    Hao Li
    Ning Zhang
    Zhi-wei Wang
    Teng-fei Zhao
    Lin-wei Chen
    Gang Chen
    Qi-xin Chen
    Fang-cai Li
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [2] Initial Efficacy After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Classified as Schizas Grade A to D
    Sun, Ke
    Zhou, Guangwen
    Jiang, Zhiye
    Wang, Longjian
    Wei, Guanjie
    Wang, Honggang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 194
  • [3] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Quan-You
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Heng, Wei
    Yang, Fan
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [4] Does the Position of Cage Affect the Clinical Outcome of Lateral Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
    Qiao, Guangxi
    Feng, Min
    Liu, Jian
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Ge, Miao
    Yang, Bin
    Yue, Bin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (02) : 204 - 208
  • [5] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [6] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [7] Rate of Revision Surgery After Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nemani, Venu M.
    Aichmair, Alexander
    Taher, Fadi
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (05) : E326 - E331
  • [8] Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis
    Hui-Min Li
    Ren-Jie Zhang
    Cai-Liang Shen
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [9] Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Berjano, Pedro
    Langella, Francesco
    Damilano, Marco
    Pejrona, Matteo
    Buric, Josip
    Ismael, Maryem
    Villafane, Jorge Hugo
    Lamartina, Claudio
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S369 - S371
  • [10] Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Pedro Berjano
    Francesco Langella
    Marco Damilano
    Matteo Pejrona
    Josip Buric
    Maryem Ismael
    Jorge Hugo Villafañe
    Claudio Lamartina
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 369 - 371