Internal Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Committee Members, Senior Management, and Internal Auditors

被引:43
作者
Trotman, Andrew J. [1 ]
Duncan, Keith R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Bond Univ, Southport, Qld, Australia
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2018年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
corporate governance; internal audit; qualitative research; quality; EXTERNAL AUDITORS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; SERVICE QUALITY; SARBANES-OXLEY; RELIANCE; FRAMEWORK; JUDGMENT; RISK; EXPERIMENTATION; COMPENSATION;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-51877
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the concept of internal audit function (IAF) quality from a multi-stakeholder perspective through conducting 36 interviews with key IAF stakeholder groups: audit committee members, senior management, internal audit executives, and outsourced internal audit partners from the major accounting firms. We adapt established quality frameworks that suggest quality is a five-dimensional construct (including input, process, output, outcome, and contextual dimensions) to the internal audit context. We find that the various stakeholder groups focus on different quality dimensions in their evaluation of IAF quality. For example, the groups focus on the process dimension (internal audit executives), output dimension (audit committee members and internal audit partners), or outcome dimension (senior management and internal audit partners). We also find that the five dimensions comprise multiple indicators of IAF quality. We conduct six supplementary interviews with external audit partners to compare their insights on IAF quality to the focal IAF stakeholder groups. External auditors evaluate quality via the output dimension after an ex ante assessment focusing on the input dimension. Finally, we contribute to the IAF quality literature by developing a multi-stakeholder IAF quality framework.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 259
页数:25
相关论文
共 99 条
[31]   Enterprise Risk Management and the Financial Reporting Process: The Experiences of Audit Committee Members, CFOs, and External Auditors [J].
Cohen, Jeffrey ;
Krishnamoorthy, Ganesh ;
Wright, Arnold .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2017, 34 (02) :1178-1209
[32]   Corporate Governance in the Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Era: Auditors' Experiences [J].
Cohen, Jeffrey ;
Krishnamoorthy, Ganesh ;
Wright, Arnie .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 27 (03) :751-+
[33]   The Effectiveness of SOX Regulation: An Interview Study of Corporate Directors [J].
Cohen, Jeffrey R. ;
Hayes, Colleen ;
Krishnamoorthy, Ganesh ;
Monroe, Gary S. ;
Wright, Arnold M. .
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2013, 25 (01) :61-87
[34]   A review of archival auditing research [J].
DeFond, Mark ;
Zhang, Jieying .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (2-3) :275-326
[35]   Internal Audit Sourcing Arrangements and Reliance by External Auditors [J].
Desai, Naman K. ;
Gerard, Gregory J. ;
Tripathy, Arindam .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2011, 30 (01) :149-171
[36]   An Analytical Model for External Auditor Evaluation of the Internal Audit Function Using Belief Functions [J].
Desai, Vikram ;
Roberts, Robin W. ;
Srivastava, Rajendra .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 27 (02) :537-+
[37]   A test of the auditor reliability framework using lenders' judgments [J].
DeZoort, F. Todd ;
Holt, Travis ;
Taylor, Mark H. .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2012, 37 (08) :519-533
[38]   Does Internal Audit Function Quality Deter Management Misconduct? [J].
Ege, Matthew S. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 90 (02) :495-527
[39]   BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY - PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE [J].
EINHORN, HJ ;
HOGARTH, RM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1981, 19 (01) :1-31
[40]  
Felix WL, 2001, J ACCOUNTING RES, V39, P513