Clinical Experience of Implementing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics (OVIVA) in a Specialist Orthopedic Hospital

被引:31
|
作者
Azamgarhi, Tariq [1 ]
Shah, Ashik [1 ]
Warren, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp NHS Trust, Pharm Dept, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Royal Free London NHS Fdn Trust, Royal Free Site, Dept Microbiol, London, England
关键词
antibiotic; intravenous; infection; bone; oral;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciaa985
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics (OVIVA) Trial demonstrated that oral therapy, when used during the initial 6 weeks in the treatment in bone and joint infection (BJI), is noninferior to intravenous therapy. To date there are no reports describing reproducibility of these findings in a real-world setting. Methods. We studied all patients diagnosed with BJI at our hospital 12 months pre- and postimplementation of the OVIVA trial findings into clinical practice. An infection consultant recommended antibiotic treatment and patients were followed up by an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) service. Prospective data from a local registry was used to analyze baseline clinical details, outcome, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs. Results. A cohort of 328 patients (145 pre- and 183 postimplementation) was analyzed. Postimplementation, 66.1% of patients were switched to a suitable oral antibiotic regimen. Definite failure at 1 year was 13.6% in the preimplementation group and 18.6% in the postimplementation group (P = .154). Postimplementation, definite failure was more common in patients requiring intravenous antibiotics due to lack of suitable oral options (intravenous, 26.7% and oral, 14.3%). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) requiring closer monitoring or change to treatment were more common postimplementation (21.0% and 37.1%, respectively). ADR-related hospital readmissions were similar in both groups (2.1 and 2.2%). Comparing both groups, the postimplementation group showed a reduction of 4 days in the median LOS and a median cost reduction of 2764.28 pound per patient. Conclusions. The OVIVA trial findings can be safely implemented into clinical practice when patients on oral antibiotics are followed up by an established OPAT service. Two-thirds of patients were switched to a suitable oral antibiotic regimen. Implementation led to reductions in hospital LOS and antibiotic costs.
引用
收藏
页码:E2582 / E2588
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections (OVIVA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Li, Ho Kwong
    Scarborough, Matthew
    Zambellas, Rhea
    Cooper, Cushla
    Rombach, Ines
    Walker, A. Sarah
    Lipsky, Benjamin A.
    Briggs, Andrew
    Seaton, Andrew
    Atkins, Bridget
    Woodhouse, Andrew
    Berendt, Anthony
    Byren, Ivor
    Angus, Brian
    Pandit, Hemant
    Stubbs, David
    McNally, Martin
    Thwaites, Guy
    Bejon, Philip
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [2] Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections (OVIVA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Ho Kwong Li
    Matthew Scarborough
    Rhea Zambellas
    Cushla Cooper
    Ines Rombach
    A. Sarah Walker
    Benjamin A. Lipsky
    Andrew Briggs
    Andrew Seaton
    Bridget Atkins
    Andrew Woodhouse
    Anthony Berendt
    Ivor Byren
    Brian Angus
    Hemant Pandit
    David Stubbs
    Martin McNally
    Guy Thwaites
    Philip Bejon
    Trials, 16
  • [3] Oral versus intravenous antibiotics in treatment of paediatric febrile neutropenia
    Vedi, Aditi
    Cohn, Richard
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (03) : 170 - 178
  • [4] Comparing Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics Administration for Cellulitis Infection: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yin, Raymond
    Jiang, Jingyi
    Wang, Yiyang
    Jin, Yuhao
    Qian, Eric
    Yue, Chenyang
    Jiang, Coco
    Wang, Michelle
    Xu, Kylie
    Zhou, Xiaoyuan
    Hou, Winston
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [5] Intravenous versus intravenous/oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chuan Wang
    Yanan Li
    Yi Ji
    BMC Pediatrics, 19
  • [6] Intravenous versus intravenous/oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Chuan
    Li, Yanan
    Ji, Yi
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [7] Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Pediatric Osteoarticular Infection: When and to Whom?
    Alcobendas Rueda, Rosa M.
    Nunez, Esmeralda
    Martin, Laura
    Belen Hernandez, Maria
    Saavedra-Lozano, Jesus
    Udaondo, Clara
    Murias, Sara
    Remesal, Agustin
    Calvo, Cristina
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (09) : E351 - E357
  • [8] Transition to Oral versus Continued Intravenous Antibiotics for Patients with Pyogenic Liver Abscesses: A Retrospective Analysis
    Giangiuli, Stephanie E.
    Mueller, Scott W.
    Jeffres, Meghan N.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2019, 39 (07): : 734 - 740
  • [9] Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot
    Gill, Ankurpreet Singh
    Gorski, Matthew
    Strage, Katya Eve
    Dunn, Jason Tyler
    Jerabek, Morgan
    Hoffman, Kristine Marie
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (04) : 735 - 738
  • [10] Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics at a Single Level 1 Academic Medical Trauma Center
    Kipp, Jennifer A.
    Lesavage, Lindsay K.
    Evans, Joni K.
    Denmeade, Travis A.
    Blazek, Cody D.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 63 (04) : 490 - 494