Effects of electrolyte concentration and pH on the coalescence stability of β-lactoglobulin emulsions:: Experiment and interpretation

被引:58
作者
Tcholakova, S
Denkov, ND
Sidzhakova, D
Ivanov, IB
Campbell, B
机构
[1] Univ Sofia, Lab Chem Phys & Engn, Fac Chem, Sofia 1164, Bulgaria
[2] Kraft Gen Foods Inc, Glenview, IL 60025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la046891w
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Experimental results are presented about the effects of ionic strength and pH on the mean drop-size after emulsification and on the coalescence stability of emulsions, stabilized by a globular protein beta-lactoglobulin (BLG). The mean drop-size is determined by optical microscopy, whereas the coalescence stability is characterized by centrifugation. In parallel experiments, the xi-potential and protein adsorption on drop surface are determined. The experiments are performed at two different BLG concentrations, 0.02 and 0.1 wt%. The electrolyte concentration in the aqueous phase, C(EL), is varied between 1.5 mM and 1 M, and pH is varied between 4.0 and 7.0. The experiments show that the mean drop-size after emulsification depends slightly on C(EL), at fixed protein concentration and natural pH = 6.2. When pH is varied, the mean drop-size passes through a maximum at fixed protein and electrolyte concentrations. A monolayer protein adsorption is registered in the studied ranges of C(EL) and pH at low BLG concentration of 0.02 wt%. In contrast, a protein multilayer is formed at higher BLG concentration, 0.1 wt%, above a certain electrolyte concentration (C(EL) > 100 mM, natural pH). The experimental results for the emulsion coalescence stability are analyzed by considering the surface forces acting between the emulsion drops. The electrostatic, van der Waals, and steric interactions are taken into account to calculate the barriers in the disjoining pressure isotherm at the various experimental conditions studied. The comparison of the theoretically calculated and the experimentally determined coalescence barriers shows that three qualitatively different cases can be distinguished. (1) Electrostatically stabilized emulsions, with monolayer protein adsorption, whose stability can be described by the DLVO theory. (2) Sterically stabilized emulsions, in which the drop-drop repulsion is created mainly by overlapping protein adsorption multilayers. A simple theoretical model is shown to describe emulsion stability in these systems. (3) Sterically stabilized emulsions with a monolayer adsorption on drop surface.
引用
收藏
页码:4842 / 4855
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Detection of the hydrophobic surface force in foam films by measurements of the critical thickness of the film rupture [J].
Angarska, JK ;
Dimitrova, BS ;
Danov, KD ;
Kralchevsky, PA ;
Ananthapadmanabhan, KP ;
Lips, A .
LANGMUIR, 2004, 20 (05) :1799-1806
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENCY EMULSION TECHNO
[3]   NEUTRON REFLECTIVITY OF ADSORBED BETA-CASEIN AND BETA-LACTOGLOBULIN AT THE AIR/WATER INTERFACE [J].
ATKINSON, PJ ;
DICKINSON, E ;
HORNE, DS ;
RICHARDSON, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-FARADAY TRANSACTIONS, 1995, 91 (17) :2847-2854
[4]  
BENJAMINS J, 2000, THESIS WAGENINGEN U
[5]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[6]   Adsorption dynamics of native and pentylated bovine serum albumin at air-water interfaces: Surface concentration surface pressure measurements [J].
Cho, D ;
Narsimhan, G ;
Franses, EI .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 191 (02) :312-325
[7]   PROTEIN INTERACTIONS AT SOLID-SURFACES [J].
CLAESSON, PM ;
BLOMBERG, E ;
FROBERG, JC ;
NYLANDER, T ;
ARNEBRANT, T .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1995, 57 :161-227
[8]   Adsorption dynamics of α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin at air-water interfaces [J].
Cornec, M ;
Cho, D ;
Narsimhan, G .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1999, 214 (02) :129-142
[9]   Food emulsions stabilized by proteins [J].
Dalgleish, DG .
CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 2 (06) :573-577
[10]   Coalescence processes in emulsions [J].
Danner, T ;
Schubert, H .
FOOD COLLOIDS: FUNDAMENTALS OF FORMULATION, 2001, (258) :116-124