Moisture-stress management under limited and assured irrigation regimes in wheat (Triticum aestivum): Effects on crop productivity, water use efficiency, grain quality, nutrient acquisition and soil fertility

被引:0
|
作者
Bana, R. S. [1 ]
Sepat, Seema [1 ]
Rana, K. S. [1 ]
Pooniya, V [1 ]
Choudhary, Anil K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] Div Agron, New Delhi, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2018年 / 88卷 / 10期
关键词
Aqua-sowing; Limited irrigation; Moisture-stress management; Organic mulch; Pusa hydrogel; Wheat; PEARLMILLET PENNISETUM-GLAUCUM; RAIN-FED CONDITIONS; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; INTERCROPPING SYSTEM; PROFITABILITY; AMENDMENTS; INDIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A field experiment was carried-out for three consecutive years during winter seasons of 2010-11 to 2012-13 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to evaluate the effect of various moisture-stress management options on crop and water productivity, quality, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend Fiori and Paol] The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications comprising eight treatments, viz. Pusa hydrogel under assured irrigation (PHLI), organic mulch under assured irrigation (OMAI), aqua-sowing under assured irrigation (ASAI), control under assured irrigation (CAI), Pusa hydrogel under limited irrigation (PHLI), organic mulch under limited irrigation (OMLI), aqua-sowing under limited irrigation (ASLI), and control under limited irrigation (CLI). The maximum plant height (87.2 cm), tillers/m 2 (560) and LAI (5.19) were recorded with OMAI followed by PHAI and ASAI. Wheat grain yield increased by 5.9, 6.7 and 11.4% due to aquasowing, Pusa hydrogel and organic mulch, respectively under assured irrigation. Per cent grain yield improvement under limited irrigation was 13.2, 14.8 and 22.1% owing to aqua-sowing, Pusa hydrogel and organic mulch, respectively. The grain protein content was more under limited irrigation with maximum protein (10.33%) under CLI. Highest consumptive use (430 mm) was recorded under OMAI; however, the maximum water-use efficiency was found with OMLI (11.7 kg/ha-mm) followed by ASLI (11.4 kg/ha-mm). Under limited irrigation, the lowest proline accumulation was recorded under OMLI (9.3 mu g/g fresh weight) while under PHLI and ASLI it was 10.2 and 13.1 mu g/g fresh weight, respectively. Overall, it is highlighted that under limited irrigation, the organic mulching followed by Pusa hydrogel and aqua-sowing can be good options to achieve higher crop and water productivity and nutrient acquisition in wheat under water starved agro-ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1606 / 1612
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Wheat (Triticum aestivum) response under soil moisture and crop water stress based irrigation scheduling at variable nitrogen regimes
    Ankit
    Khanna, Manoj
    Dass, Anchal
    Sudhishri, Susama
    Babu, Subhash
    Kaur, Ramanjit
    Shekhawat, Kapila
    Prajapati, Vijay Kumar
    Sahoo, Rabi Narayan
    Singh, Teekam
    Meena, Mahesh Chand
    Upadhyay, Pravin Kumar
    Jain, Niveta
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 94 (11): : 1171 - 1176
  • [2] Productivity and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) under Different Resource Conservation Techniques and Irrigation Regimes
    Behera, U. K.
    Sharma, A. R.
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 42 (03) : 439 - 449
  • [3] Productivity and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) under Different Resource Conservation Techniques and Irrigation Regimes
    U. K. Behera
    A. R. Sharma
    Cereal Research Communications, 2014, 42 : 439 - 449
  • [4] Tillage Crop Establishment and Irrigation Methods Improve the Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum): Water Use Studies, and the Biological Properties and Fertility Status of Soil
    Kumar, Rajendra
    Naresh, Ram Krishan
    Bhatt, Rajan
    Chandra, Mandapelli Sharath
    Kumar, Deepak
    Alamri, Saud
    Siddiqui, Manzer H.
    Alfagham, Alanoud T.
    Kalaji, Hazem M.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [5] Effect of irrigation regimes and nutrient management on soil water dynamics, evapo-transpiration and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Vertisol
    Hati, KM
    Mandal, KG
    Misra, AK
    Ghosh, PK
    Acharya, CL
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2001, 71 (09): : 581 - 586
  • [6] Nutrient management productivity and nutrient-use efficiency in floodplain soils under maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping
    Saini, Sat Pal
    Singh, Pritpal
    Brar, B. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 89 (10): : 1589 - 1593
  • [7] Integrated effect of saline water irrigation and phosphorus fertilization practices on wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth, productivity, nutrient content and soil proprieties under dryland farming
    Bouras, Hamza
    Mamassi, Achraf
    Devkota, Krishna Prasad
    Choukr-Allah, Redouane
    Bouazzama, Bassou
    PLANT STRESS, 2023, 10
  • [8] Effect of potassium fertilization on water productivity, irrigation water use efficiency, and grain quality under direct seeded rice-wheat cropping system
    Vijayakumar, S.
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Ramesh, Kulasekaran
    Jinger, Dinesh
    Rajpoot, Sudhir K.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2022, 45 (13) : 2023 - 2038
  • [9] Soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendations under integrated nutrient management for higher productivity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and (Triticum aestivum) wheat under long term experiment
    Sharma, V. K.
    Pandey, R. N.
    Kumar, Sarvendra
    Chobhe, Kapil Atmaram
    Chandra, Suresh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2016, 86 (08): : 1076 - 1081
  • [10] Weed and nitrogen management effects on weed suppression, soil properties and crop productivity in a maize (Zea mays) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under conservation agriculture
    Oyeogbe, A., I
    Das, T. K.
    Rana, K. S.
    Paul, Sangeeta
    Bandyopadhyay, K. K.
    Bhatia, Arti
    Singh, Shashi Bala
    Raj, Rishi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2018, 88 (11): : 37 - 43