Digital Economy in Visegrad Countries. Multiple-criteria Decision Analysis at Regional Level in The Years 2012 and 2015

被引:95
作者
Balcerzak, Adam P. [1 ]
Pietrzak, Michal Bernard [2 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Dept Econ, Ul Gagarina 13a, PL-87100 Torun, Poland
[2] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Dept Econometr & Stat, Ul Gagarina 13a, PL-87100 Torun, Poland
关键词
digital economy; multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); TOPSIS; generalized distance measure GDM; regions; NUTS; 1; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; FIRM; INNOVATION; GROWTH; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.7441/joc.2017.02.01
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Building effective digital economy infrastructure is currently a basic condition for improving international competitiveness of middle income countries that want to close their development gap and avoid the problem of a middle income trap. From the national perspective, investing in digital economy can be a tool which supports sustainable development and increases the speed of convergence process at regional level. In this context, comparative research on development of the digital economy, both at national and regional level, should be considered as an actual and important scientific task. Therefore, the main aim of the article is to assess and compare the development level of digital economy in Visegrad countries at regional level (NUTS 1). In the research, the digital economy is defined as a multiple-criteria phenomenon. As a result, in the empirical research, the TOPSIS method with application of generalized distance measure GDM was used. The data for diagnostic variables concerning digital infrastructure in the years 2012 and 2015 was provided by Eurostat. On the one hand, the analysis confirmed a relatively quick progress in building digital economy at regional level in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. On the other hand, significant disparities between the analyzed regions can be seen, especially in case of Polish regions.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 18
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Middle-income growth traps [J].
Agenor, Pierre-Richard ;
Canuto, Otaviano .
RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2015, 69 (04) :641-660
[2]   Accurate multi-criteria decision making methodology for recommending machine learning algorithm [J].
Ali, Rahman ;
Lee, Sungyoung ;
Chung, Tae Choong .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 71 :257-278
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, KNOWL BAS EC
[4]   Multiple Criteria Inventory Classiffication in an Electronics Firm [J].
Arikan, Feyzan ;
Citak, Senay .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2017, 16 (02) :315-331
[5]  
Ark Van B., 2003, EC PROGRAM WORKING P
[6]  
Balcerzak AP, 2017, 11TH PROFESSOR ALEKSANDER ZELIAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND FORECASTING OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PHENOMENA, P21
[7]   QUALITY OF INSTITUTIONS FOR KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY WITHIN NEW INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS FRAMEWORK. MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN THE YEARS 2000-2013 [J].
Balcerzak, Adam P. ;
Pietrzak, Michal Bernard .
ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2016, 9 (04) :66-81
[8]   Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis [J].
Balcerzak, Adam P. .
MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (03) :7-17
[9]   EUROPE 2020 STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY BETWEEN OLD AND NEW MEMBER STATES. APPLICATION OF ZERO UNITARIZATION METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS IN THE YEARS 2004-2013 [J].
Balcerzak, Adam P. .
ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 8 (02) :190-210
[10]   Development of an interval type-2 fuzzy sets based hierarchical MADM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS [J].
Baykasoglu, Adil ;
Golcuk, Ilker .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 70 :37-51