An Italian program of external quality control for chromogranin A (CgA) assay: performance evaluation of CgA determination

被引:21
作者
Verderio, Paolo
Dittadi, Ruggero
Marubini, Ettore
Pizzamiglio, Sara
Gion, Massimo
De Apollonia, Leandro
Paradiso, Angelo
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Tumori, Fdn IRCCS, Unit Med Stat & Biometry, Milan, Italy
[2] AULSS 12, Clin Pathol Lab, Venice, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Inst Med Stat & Biometry, Milan, Italy
[4] AULSS 12, Clin Pathol Lab, Ctr Biol Markers Malignancy, Consortium Ist Oncol Veneto,IRCCS, Venice, Italy
[5] Ctr Riferimento Oncol, Aviano, Italy
[6] Natl Canc Inst, Bari, Italy
关键词
chromogranin A; control chart; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); external quality control program; immunoradiometric assay (IRMA); principal component analysis;
D O I
10.1515/CCLM.2007.251
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Chromogranin A (CgA) is an acidic glycoprotein produced by many neuroendocrine cells and neurons. Currently, two different methods for assaying CgA, immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), are widely used in routine practice. Within the framework of a Ministry of Health project, an External Quality Control program was developed to investigate the state of the art of CgA determination in Italy and to monitor the performance of laboratories carrying out this assay. This paper reports the results regarding laboratory performance. Methods: A total of 43 laboratories participated in this program, in which 21 used the ELISA method and 22 the IRMA method. Each laboratory received six samples, three aliquots of serum and three of plasma, at high, intermediate and low concentrations. The results provided by the two assay methods were analyzed separately using two statistical approaches, the principal component analysis and the control chart method. Results: For the IRMA method, questionable results for all samples were obtained by two laboratories, while in two other laboratories performance was questionable for only one sample. For the ELISA method, questionable performances were obtained in only one laboratory for the low and intermediate concentration samples, whereas in three laboratories performance was questionable for only one sample. Interestingly, the coefficients of variation increased approximately five-fold when shifting from the IRMA to the ELISA method. Conclusions: This program demonstrated both the requirement and demand for external quality assessment of CgA assay.
引用
收藏
页码:1244 / 1250
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1952, STAT BIOASSAY
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   A new human chromogranin A (CgA) immunoradiometric assay involving monoclonal antibodies raised against the unprocessed central domain (145-245) [J].
Degorce, F ;
Goumon, Y ;
Jacquemart, L ;
Vidaud, C ;
Bellanger, L ;
Pons-Anicet, D ;
Seguin, P ;
Metz-Boutigue, MH ;
Aunis, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (01) :65-71
[4]   Tumor markers in neuroendocrine tumors [J].
Eriksson, B ;
Öberg, K ;
Stridsberg, M .
DIGESTION, 2000, 62 :33-38
[5]   Chromogranin-A as a serum marker for neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with neuron-specific enolase and correlation with immunohistochemical findings [J].
Giovanella, L ;
La Rosa, S ;
Ceriani, L ;
Uccella, S ;
Erba, F ;
Garancini, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 1999, 14 (03) :160-166
[6]  
HOLANDER M, 1973, NONPARAMETRIC STAT M
[7]  
JOLIFFE IT, 1986, PRINCIPLE COMPONENT
[8]   Comparison between two methods in the determination of circulating chromogranin A in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): Results of a prospective multicenter observational study [J].
Leon, A ;
Torta, A ;
Dittadi, R ;
Uberti, ED ;
Ambrosio, MR ;
Delle Fave, G ;
De Braud, F ;
Tomassetti, P ;
Gion, A ;
Dogliotti, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2005, 20 (03) :156-168
[9]   Statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control of real-time PCR [J].
Marubini, E ;
Verderio, P ;
Raggi, CC ;
Pazzagli, M ;
Orlando, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2004, 19 (02) :141-146
[10]  
MILLER JC, 1984, STAT ANAL CHEM, P62