Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care

被引:3
作者
Groenewegen, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Johan [1 ]
Fahy, Nick [4 ]
Haarmann, Alexander [1 ,5 ]
Montante, Sabrina [6 ]
Muscat, Natasha Azzopardi [7 ]
Poldrugovac, Mircha [8 ,9 ]
Ricciardi, Walter [10 ]
Tomaselli, Gianpaolo [11 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] European Observ Hlth Syst & Policies, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Berlin Univ Governance, Hertie Sch, Berlin, Germany
[6] Inst Super Sanita, Rome, Italy
[7] Univ Malta, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Msida, Malta
[8] Natl Inst Publ Hlth Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[9] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[10] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
[11] Univ Malta, Msida, Malta
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
international comparison; primary care; priority setting; transferability; HEALTH SYSTEMS; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1017/S1463423622000287
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aim: To inform the primary care community about priorities for research in primary care as came up from the European project TO-REACH and to discuss transferability of service and policy innovations between countries. Background: TO-REACH stands for Transfer of Organizational innovations for Resilient, Effective, equitable, Accessible, sustainable and Comprehensive Health services and systems. This EU-funded project has put health systems and services research higher on the European agenda and has led to the current development of a European 'Partnership Transforming Health and Care Systems'. Methods: To identify research priorities, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Policy documents and strategic roadmaps were searched, and priorities were mapped. Stakeholders were involved through national roundtable consultations and online consultations. Regarding transferability, we carried out a review of the literature, guided by a conceptual framework, and using a snowballing approach. Findings: Primary care emerged as an important priority from the inventory, as are areas that are conducive to strengthening primary care, such as workforce policies. The large variation in service organisation and policy around primary care in Europe is a huge potential for cross-country learning. However, the simple transfer of primary care service and policy arrangements from one health system to another has a big chance to fail, unless known conditions for successful transfer are taken into account and gaps in our knowledge about transfer are resolved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DISRUPTIVE INNOVATIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK A
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WHO global strategy on people-centered and Integrated health services: Interim report
[4]   Health workforce planning in Europe: Creating learning country clusters [J].
Batenburg, Ronald .
HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (12) :1537-1544
[5]  
Bosmans MWG., 2021, TECHNICAL SERIES PR
[6]  
EXPH, 2020, ORG RES HLTH SOC CAR
[7]   Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Robert, G ;
Macfarlane, F ;
Bate, P ;
Kyriakidou, O .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2004, 82 (04) :581-629
[8]   Analyzing European health systems: Europe as a research laboratory [J].
Groenewegen, Peter P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 23 (02) :185-186
[9]  
Hansen J., 2021, What Are the Key Priority Areas where European Health Systems Can Learn from Each Other?
[10]  
Hummers-Pradier E., 2009, Research agenda for general practice / family medicine and primary health care in Europe