Factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity of the Sheehan Disability Scale in a Spanish primary care sample

被引:61
作者
Luciano, Juan V. [1 ,2 ]
Bertsch, Jordan [1 ]
Salvador-Carulla, Luis [2 ,4 ]
Tomás, Jose M. [3 ]
Fernandez, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Pinto-Meza, Alejandra [1 ,2 ]
Haro, Josep M. [1 ,5 ]
Palao, Diego J. [6 ]
Serrano-Blanco, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn St Joan de Deu, Barcelona 08830, Spain
[2] Red Invest Act Prevent & Promoc Salud RedIAPP, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Metodol Ciencias Comportamiento, Valencia, Spain
[4] Asociac Cient PSICOST, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
[5] CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Corp Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
disability; factor analysis; primary health care; reliability; validity; SOCIAL ANXIETY; PANIC DISORDER; DEPRESSION; IMPAIRMENT; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; SYMPTOMS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01211.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims and objectives The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a three-item instrument that measures disability in three inter-related domains: work, family life/home responsibilities and social/leisure activities. The main objective of the present study was to examine the factor structure, reliability and construct validity of the SDS in a wide Spanish sample of primary care (PC) patients. Methods One phase cross-sectional survey. A total of 3815 patients, aged 18 years or older attending PC for a medical visit, were interviewed between October 2005 and March 2006. The interviews included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders for depressive and anxiety disorders, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for the rest of mental disorders, a medical conditions checklist, the 2.0 version of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) for measuring quality of life and the SDS. Results The principal component analysis and the subsequent confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the SDS is one-dimensional (normed fit index = 0.990, non-normed fit index = 0.987, comparative fit index = 0.991, goodness-of-fit index = 0.993, standardized root mean-square residual = 0.037, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.053). The internal consistency of the scale was good (alpha = 0.83) and it was significantly associated with the physical and mental component of the SF-12. Concerning discriminative validity, patients with major depression or panic disorder scored higher on the SDS than patients with chronic medical conditions or with no chronic pathology. We also found that a cut-off point of 8 in the SDS adequately discriminated between patients with and without depression (area under the curve = 0.814, sensitivity = 81.60%, specificity = 70.60%). Conclusions The SDS seems a reliable, valid and useful clinical tool for measuring disability in Spanish PC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 901
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ALONSO J, 1995, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V104, P771
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FORCE DSM 4 DSM 4 T, DOI 10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, INNOVATIVE CARE CHRO
[4]   Prevalence and impact of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in primary care in Belgium and Luxemburg: the GADIS study [J].
Ansseau, M ;
Fischler, B ;
Dierick, M ;
Mignon, A ;
Leyman, S .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 20 (03) :229-235
[5]  
ANSSEAU M, 2007, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V26, P1
[6]  
Bobes J, 1999, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V112, P530
[7]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]  
Ferrando L, 1998, MINI INT NEUROPSYCHI
[10]  
Finney SJ, 2006, QUANT METH EDUC BEHA, P269