Prediction of intensive care unit admission (>24h) after surgery in elective noncardiac surgical patients using machine learning algorithms

被引:6
作者
Lan, Lan [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Fangwei [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Luo, Jiawei [1 ,4 ]
Li, Mengjiao [1 ,4 ]
Hao, Xuechao [5 ]
Hu, Yao [1 ,4 ]
Yin, Jin [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Zhu, Tao [5 ]
Zhou, Xiaobo [7 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, West China Biomed Big Data Ctr, 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Xiangyang, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, IT Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Med X Ctr Informat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, West China Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Biomed Informat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 8卷
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Surgical risk; machine learning; predicting; American Society of Anesthesiologists score; China; ICU ADMISSION; OUTCOMES; TRIAGE; MORTALITY; ACCURACY; MODELS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1177/20552076221110543
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To develop a highly discriminative machine learning model for the prediction of intensive care unit admission (>24h) using the easily available preoperative information from electronic health records. An accurate prediction model for ICU admission after surgery is of great importance for surgical risk assessment and appropriate utilization of ICU resources. Method Data were collected retrospectively from a large hospital, comprising 135,442 adult patients who underwent surgery except for cardiac surgery between 1 January 2014, and 31 July 2018 in China. Multiple existing predictive machine learning algorithms were explored to construct the prediction model, including logistic regression, random forest, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting machine. Four secondary analyses were conducted to improve the interpretability of the results. Results A total of 2702 (2.0%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively. The gradient boosting machine model attained the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. The machine learning models predicted intensive care unit admission better than the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.68). The gradient boosting machine recognized several features as highly significant predictors for postoperatively intensive care unit admission. By applying subgroup analysis and secondary analysis, we found that patients with operations on the digestive, respiratory, and vascular systems had higher probabilities for intensive care unit admission. Conclusion Compared with conventional American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status and logistic regression model, the gradient boosting machine could improve the performance in the prediction of intensive care unit admission. Machine learning models could be used to improve the discrimination and identify the need for intensive care unit admission after surgery in elective noncardiac surgical patients, which could help manage the surgical risk.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature [J].
Alba, Ana Carolina ;
Agoritsas, Thomas ;
Walsh, Michael ;
Hanna, Steven ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
McGinn, Thomas ;
Guyatt, Gordon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (14) :1377-1384
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DOES SPACE MAKE WAST
[3]   What's new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning [J].
Bailly, Sebastien ;
Meyfroidt, Geert ;
Timsit, Jean-Francois .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (09) :1524-1527
[4]   Validating the Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) Score for Risk Stratification of Surgical Inpatients in the Postoperative Setting Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Bartkowiak, Bartlomiej ;
Snyder, Ashley M. ;
Benjamin, Andrew ;
Schneider, Andrew ;
Twu, Nicole M. ;
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Roggin, Kevin K. ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (06) :1059-1063
[5]   Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care [J].
Beam, Andrew L. ;
Kohane, Isaac S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (13) :1317-1318
[6]   Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Dunn, Jack ;
Velmahos, George C. ;
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) :574-583
[7]  
Biccard BM, 2018, LANCET, V391, P1589, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1, 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30001-1]
[8]   MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery [J].
Bihorac, Azra ;
Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan ;
Ebadi, Ashkan ;
Motaei, Amir ;
Madkour, Mohcine ;
Pardalos, Panagote M. ;
Lipori, Gloria ;
Hogan, William R. ;
Efron, Philip A. ;
Moore, Frederick ;
Moldawer, Lyle L. ;
Wang, Daisy Zhe ;
Hobson, Charles E. ;
Rashidi, Parisi ;
Li, Xiaolin ;
Momcilovic, Petar .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) :652-662
[9]   Comparison of Surgical Risk Score, POSSUM and p-POSSUM in higher-risk surgical patients [J].
Brooks, MJ ;
Sutton, R ;
Sarin, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (10) :1288-1292
[10]   Post-operative intensive care unit admission after elective non-cardiac surgery: A single-center analysis of the NSQIP database [J].
Bruceta, Melanio ;
De Souza, Luisa ;
Carr, Zyad J. ;
Bonavia, Anthony ;
Kunselman, Allen R. ;
Karamchandani, Kunal .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 64 (03) :319-328