Validation of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed patients in Serbia

被引:0
作者
Mihajlovic, Goran [1 ]
Vojvodic, Petar [2 ]
Vojvodic, Jovana [2 ]
Andonov, Ana [3 ]
Hinic, Darko [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Kragujevac, Serbia
[2] Dr Laza Lazarevic Clin Psychiat Disorders, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Singidunum Univ, Fac Media & Commun, Dept Clin Psychol, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Kragujevac, Dept Psychol, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
depression; Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; instrument validation; VERSION; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.2298/SARH200401004M
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction/Objective The aim of this study was the validation of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in patients in Serbia suffering from depression. Methods Both test and retest situations have been conducted on 162 adult patients with major depressive disorder, and on 110 individuals that have not shown any type of mental disorder (control group). The sample included 58.8% male and 41.2% female participants, age between 20 and 79 years (M = 42.26, SD = 11.53) with no differences between groups in terms of participants' sex and age. The following instruments were used: MADRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Results MADRS has shown good psychometric characteristics: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and its discriminatory validity is adequate. Study also confirmed the one-dimensionality of the instrument. Statistically significant differences between the groups, in terms age and education, have been identified, but the effects of the differences were small. Conclusion The MADRS scale has shown good psychometric characteristics in our study; thus, it may be used for the assessment of depressed states in Serbian patients.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 321
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, DEPRESSION
  • [2] Anthoine E, 2004, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, V12, P176
  • [3] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [4] Meta-analysis of the changes in correlations between depression instruments used in longitudinal studies
    Bukumiric, Zoran
    Starcevic, Vladan
    Stanisavljevic, Dejana
    Marinkovic, Jelena
    Milic, Natasa
    Djukic-Dejanovic, Slavica
    Janjic, Vladimir
    Corac, Aleksandar
    Ilic, Aleksandra
    Kostic, Mirjana
    Nikolic, Ivan
    Trajkovic, Goran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 190 : 733 - 743
  • [5] Cano Juan Fernando, 2016, rev.colomb.psiquiatr., V45, P146, DOI [10.1016/j.rcp.2015.08.006, 10.1016/j.rcp.2015.08.0060034-7450]
  • [6] Hamilton depression rating scale and montgomery-asberg depression rating scale in depressed and bipolar I patients: psychometric properties in a Brazilian sample
    Carneiro, Adriana Munhoz
    Fernandes, Fernando
    Moreno, Ricardo Alberto
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [7] Agreement between physicians' and patients' ratings on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
    Cunningham, Janet L.
    Wernroth, Lisa
    von Knorring, Lars
    Berglund, Lars
    Ekselius, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 135 (1-3) : 148 - 153
  • [8] Gelder M, 2009, PSYCHIATRY, P335
  • [9] A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION
    HAMILTON, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [10] Efficacy of new-generation antidepressants assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the gold standard clinician rating scale: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials
    Hengartner, Michael P.
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    Sorensen, Anders
    Ploederl, Martin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):