Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations

被引:102
作者
Makanjuola, Bayode O. [1 ]
Miglior, Filippo [1 ,2 ]
Abdalla, Emhimad A. [1 ]
Maltecca, Christian [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Schenkel, Flavio S. [1 ]
Baes, Christine F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, Ctr Genom Improvement Livestock, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Ontario Genom, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Genet Program, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[5] Univ Bern, Vetsuisse Fac, Inst Genet, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
genetic diversity; rate of inbreeding; effective population size; dairy cattle; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; DAIRY-CATTLE; UNITED-STATES; DEPRESSION; COEFFICIENTS; PREDICTION; DIVERSITY; EXTENT;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2019-18013
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genetic diversity in livestock populations is a significant contributor to the sustainability of animal production. Also, genetic diversity allows animal production to become more responsive to environmental changes and market demands. The loss of genetic diversity can result in a plateau in production and may also result in loss of fitness or viability in animal production. In this study, we investigated the rate of inbreeding (Delta F), rate of coancestry (Delta f), and effective population size (N-e) as important quantitative indicators of genetic diversity and evaluated the effect of the recent implementation of genomic selection on the loss of genetic diversity in North American Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle. To estimate the rate of inbreeding and coancestry, inbreeding and coancestry coefficients were calculated using the traditional pedigree method and genomic methods estimated from segment- and marker-based approaches. Furthermore, we estimated N-e from the rate of inbreeding and coancestry and extent of linkage disequilibrium. A total of 205,755 and 89,238 pedigreed and genotyped animals born between 1990 and 2018 inclusively were available for Holsteins and Jerseys, respectively. The estimated average pedigree inbreeding coefficients were 7.74 and 7.20% for Holsteins and Jerseys, respectively. The corresponding values for the segment and marker-by-marker genomic inbreeding coefficients were 13.61, 15.64, and 31.40% for Holsteins and 21.16, 22.54, and 42.62% for Jerseys, respectively. The average coancestry coefficients were 8.33 and 15.84% for Holsteins and 9.23 and 23.46% for Jerseys with pedigree and genomic measures, respectively. Generation interval for the whole 29-yr time period averaged approximately 5 yr for all selection pathways combined. The Delta F per generation based on pedigree, segment, and marker-by-marker genomic measures for the entire 29-yr period was estimated to be 0.75, 1.10, 1.16, and 1.02% for Holstein animals and 0.67, 0.62, 0.63, and 0.59% for Jersey animals, respectively. The Delta f was estimated to be 0.98 and 0.98% for Holsteins and 0.73 and 0.78% for Jerseys with pedigree and genomic measures, respectively. These Delta F and Delta f translated to an N-e that ranged from 43 to 66 animals for Holsteins and 64 to 85 animals for Jerseys. In addition, the Ne based on linkage disequilibrium was 58 and 120 for Holsteins and Jerseys, respectively. The 10-yr period that involved the application of genomic selection resulted in an increased Delta F per generation with ranges from 1.19 to 2.06% for pedigree and genomic measures in Holsteins. Given the rate at which inbreeding is increasing after the implementation of genomic selection, there is a need to implement measures and means for controlling the rate of inbreeding per year, which will help to manage and maintain farm animal genetic resources.
引用
收藏
页码:5183 / 5199
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DEV R VALUES REPRESE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 2 REP STAT WORLDS AN
[3]   Symposium review: The genomic architecture of inbreeding: How homozygosity affects health and performance [J].
Baes, Christine F. ;
Makanjuola, Bayode O. ;
Miglior, Filippo ;
Marras, Gabriele ;
Howard, Jeremy T. ;
Fleming, Allison ;
Maltecca, Christian .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (03) :2807-2817
[4]   Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding [J].
Bjelland, D. W. ;
Weigel, K. A. ;
Vukasinovic, N. ;
Nkrumah, J. D. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (07) :4697-4706
[5]  
Boichard D., 2002, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, August, 2002. Session 28, P1
[6]   Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain [J].
Broman, KW ;
Weber, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (06) :1493-1500
[7]   Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering [J].
Browning, Sharon R. ;
Browning, Brian L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 81 (05) :1084-1097
[8]   Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets [J].
Chang, Christopher C. ;
Chow, Carson C. ;
Tellier, Laurent C. A. M. ;
Vattikuti, Shashaank ;
Purcell, Shaun M. ;
Lee, James J. .
GIGASCIENCE, 2015, 4
[9]  
Colleau JJ, 2002, GENET SEL EVOL, V34, P409, DOI [10.1051/gse:2002015, 10.1186/1297-9686-34-4-409]
[10]   The variant call format and VCFtools [J].
Danecek, Petr ;
Auton, Adam ;
Abecasis, Goncalo ;
Albers, Cornelis A. ;
Banks, Eric ;
DePristo, Mark A. ;
Handsaker, Robert E. ;
Lunter, Gerton ;
Marth, Gabor T. ;
Sherry, Stephen T. ;
McVean, Gilean ;
Durbin, Richard .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (15) :2156-2158