Consumers' preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA

被引:108
作者
Mozumder, Pallab [1 ,2 ]
Vasquez, William F. [3 ]
Marathe, Achla [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Econ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Fairfield Univ, Dept Econ, Fairfield, CT 06824 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Virginia Bioinformat Inst, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Virginia Tech, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
Renewable energy; Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS; GREEN-ELECTRICITY; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; PRIVATE PROVISION; PUBLIC-GOODS; QUESTIONS; PARTICIPATION; MECHANISMS; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The southwestern part of the US has abundant supply of renewable energy resources but little is known about the consumers' preferences for renewable energy in this region. This paper investigates households' willingness to pay for a renewable energy program in a southwestern state, New Mexico (NM). Using the contingent valuation method, we provide different scenarios that include provision of 10% and 20% of renewable energy supply, to elicit households' willingness to pay (WTP) for the renewable energy. We estimate the WTP for specific shares of renewable energy in the total energy mix as it is a key factor in affecting the price of the energy portfolio in the market. The survey design also allows us to check the scope sensitivity of renewable energy which can help guide the future renewable energy policy. We hope results from this study will offer useful insights to energy regulators and utility companies and help them increase the share of renewable energy supply. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1126
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aguilar F.X., 2010, EXPLORATORY ANAL PRO, DOI [10.1016/j.eneco.2010.05.012, DOI 10.1016/J.ENECO.2010.05.012]
[2]  
American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), 2008, TOP 20 STAT WIND EN
[3]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[4]   The advent of Internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and Internet samples [J].
Berrens, RP ;
Bohara, AK ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Silva, C ;
Weimer, DL .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (01) :1-22
[5]  
Bird L., 2008, NRELTP6A244094
[6]   Anchoring and adjustment in single-bounded, contingent-valuation questions [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
Johnson, FR ;
McCollum, DW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (05) :1495-1500
[7]   Resolving questions about bias in real and hypothetical referenda [J].
Burton, Anthony C. ;
Carson, Katherine S. ;
Chilton, Susan M. ;
Hutchinson, W. George .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (04) :513-525
[8]  
Carlsson F, 2007, ENERG J, V28, P75
[9]   Incentive and informational properties of preference questions [J].
Carson, Richard T. ;
Groves, Theodore .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) :181-210
[10]   SEQUENCING AND NESTING IN CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS [J].
CARSON, RT ;
MITCHELL, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (02) :155-173