The role of quantum measurements in physical processes and protocols
被引:5
|
作者:
Cruikshank, Benjamin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
US Army Res Lab, Computat & Informat Sci Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
Univ Massachusetts, Dept Phys, Boston, MA 02125 USAUS Army Res Lab, Computat & Informat Sci Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
Cruikshank, Benjamin
[1
,2
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Jacobs, Kurt
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] US Army Res Lab, Computat & Informat Sci Directorate, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Phys, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Hearne Inst Theoret Phys, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
In thismainly pedagogical article, we discuss under what circumstances measurements play a special role in quantum processes. In particular, we discuss the following facts that appear to be a common area of confusion. (i) Froma fundamental point of view, measurements play no special role whatsoever: all dynamics that can be generated by measurements can be generated by unitary processes (for which post-selection is no exception). (ii) Froma purely physical point of view, measurements are not 'outside' of quantum mechanics. (iii) The only difference between the abilities of measurement-based protocols and unitary circuits for quantum computing comes from practical (technology dependent) constraints. We emphasise the importance of distinguishing between differences that are (i) fundamental but without physical import; (ii) fundamental and possess physical import; and (iii) are not fundamental but have practical import. We also emphasise the importance of separating theoretical and experimental elements of measurement, primarily projection and amplification, which are physically very different. Note that since we are concerned with facts regarding physical processes, this article has little if anything to do with interpretations of quantum mechanics.