A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems

被引:174
|
作者
Giller, Ken E. [1 ]
Corbeels, Marc [2 ]
Nyamangara, Justice [3 ]
Triomphe, Bernard [4 ]
Affholder, Francois [2 ]
Scopel, Eric [2 ]
Tittonell, Pablo [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] CIRAD UR Syst Culture Annuels, F-34398 Montpellier, France
[3] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Matopos Res Stn, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
[4] CIRAD UMR Innovat, F-34398 Montpellier, France
关键词
Zero-tillage; Labour productivity; Trade-off analysis; Weed control; Innovation systems; SOIL-EROSION; NO-TILLAGE; EMISSIONS; RESIDUES; SHIFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2011.04.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Controversy surrounds the promotion of conservation agriculture (CA) in smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. The introduction of CA is a profound change in farm management. Benefits in reduced erosion and stabilized crop production may be obtained, but technical performance at field level is but one of the determinants of adoption. For various reasons, all of the CA principles are not always fully implemented by farmers and results not as favourable as expected. As with other approaches to increasing agricultural productivity, the production constraints, farmers' objectives, and the expected benefits and costs of implementing CA are important aspects that influence adoption. At farm and village levels, trade-offs in the allocation of resources become important in determining how CA may fit into a given farming system. At a regional level, factors such as the market conditions, interactions among stakeholders and other institutional and political dimensions become important. At each level, opportunities or difficulties emerge that enhance or impede development, adaptation and adoption of CA. The ex-ante identification of situations for where CA (and which form of CA) is appropriate demands research from a multi-stakeholder, multi-level, and interdisciplinary perspective. Recommendations are made where research is required to address key knowledge gaps. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 472
页数:5
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据