Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors

被引:21
作者
Rashidi, Ali [1 ]
Sandalcioglu, I. Erol [1 ]
Luchtmann, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Med Fac, Dept Neurosurg, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY; FROZEN; IMPACT; COMPLICATIONS; CHILDREN; DEFECTS; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0228009
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. Methods In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. Results ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. Conclusion The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures [J].
Schwarz, Falko ;
Duenisch, Pedro ;
Walter, Jan ;
Sakr, Yasser ;
Kaiff, Rolf ;
Ewald, Christian .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 124 (03) :710-715
[32]   What happens to the bone flap? Long-term outcome after reimplantation of cryoconserved bone flaps in a consecutive series of 92 patients [J].
Stieglitz, Lennart Henning ;
Fung, Christian ;
Murek, Michael ;
Fichtner, Jens ;
Raabe, Andreas ;
Beck, Juergen .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (02) :275-280
[33]   Porous Polyethylene Combined With Split Calvarial Bone Graft to Cover Complex Calvarial Defect [J].
Wang, Jie-cong ;
Wang, Shi-yu ;
Gui, Lai ;
Wei, Liu ;
Xu, Jia .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (06) :1802-1804
[34]   The impact of cranioplasty on cerebral blood perfusion in patients treated with decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury [J].
Wen, Liang ;
Lou, Hai-Yan ;
Xu, Jun ;
Wang, Hao ;
Huang, Xin ;
Gong, Jiang-Biao ;
Xiong, Bin ;
Yang, Xiao-Feng .
BRAIN INJURY, 2015, 29 (13-14) :1654-1660
[35]   Early cranioplasty vs. late cranioplasty for the treatment of cranial defect: A systematic review [J].
Xu, Hao ;
Niu, Chaoshi ;
Fu, Xianming ;
Ding, Wanhai ;
Ling, Shiying ;
Jiang, Xiaofeng ;
Ji, Ying .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 136 :33-40
[36]   Cranioplasty with autogenous bone flaps cryopreserved in povidone iodine: a long-term follow-up study [J].
Zhang, Jian ;
Peng, Fei ;
Liu, Zhuang ;
Luan, Jinli ;
Liu, Xingming ;
Fei, Chang ;
Heng, Xueyuan .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 127 (06) :1449-1456
[37]   A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty [J].
Zhang, Qiuming ;
Yuan, Yikai ;
Li, Xuepei ;
Sun, Tong ;
Zhou, Yicheng ;
Yu, Hang ;
Guan, Junwen .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 :E645-E651