Modeling and assessing interdependencies between critical infrastructures using Bayesian network: A case study of inland waterway port and surrounding supply chain network

被引:110
作者
Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne [1 ]
El Amrani, Safae [1 ]
Jaradat, Raed [1 ]
Marufuzzaman, Mohammad [1 ]
Buchanan, Randy [2 ]
Rinaudo, Christina [2 ]
Hamilton, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Ind & Syst Engn Dept, 260 McCain Hall, Miss State, MS 39762 USA
[2] US Army, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
关键词
Port performance; Port supply chain; Critical infrastructure interdependency; Bayesian network; Inland waterway port; Risk and resilience; RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK; TRANSPORTATION; SYSTEM; EFFICIENCY; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; DISRUPTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.106898
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The evolution of international supply chains have created a constant need for the transportation of goods through maritime transport. This mode of transport has been beneficial through its efficiency in the mobility of a large quantities of merchandise. In this context, inland waterway ports are one of the mainstays of the maritime transportation network. The aim of this paper is (1) to model and assess the interdependency between inland port infrastructure and its surrounding supply chain and (2) to show how the disturbance in one will have a ripple effect and trigger cascading failures in the entire network. To comprehend this interconnectedness, we outline three thorough interdependency types: geographic, service provision, and access for repair. After these interdependency types are validated, the factors related to port disruption and its supply chain performance are identified, and the Bayesian network is applied to visualize the interdependency among these factors. The quantification of interdependency is examined, and the results are profoundly analyzed through different advanced techniques such as belief propagation and sensitivity analysis. The general interpretation of these analyses entails that environmental factors and supplier responsiveness are imperative to port disruption and supply chain performance, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
AGHALARI A, 2019, P IISE ANN C EXPO 20
[2]   A systemic approach for disruption risk assessment in oil and gas supply chains [J].
Alfaqiri, Abdulrahman ;
Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne ;
Jaradat, Raed ;
Abutabenjeh, Sawsan ;
Keating, Charles B. ;
Khasawneh, Mahmoud T. ;
Pinto, C. Ariel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2019, 15 (03) :230-259
[3]   Stakeholder mapping and disruption scenarios with application to resilience of a container port [J].
Almutairi, Ayedh ;
Collier, Zachary A. ;
Hendrickson, Daniel ;
Palma-Oliveira, Jose M. ;
Polmateer, Thomas L. ;
Lambert, James H. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 182 :219-232
[4]  
Amundson J, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V30, P152
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Proceedings of the international annual conference of the American society for engineering management
[6]  
[Anonymous], PORT REC RES USCG HO
[7]   Classification of human brain tumours from MRS data using Discrete Wavelet Transform and Bayesian Neural Networks [J].
Arizmendi, Carlos ;
Vellido, Alfredo ;
Romero, Enrique .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) :5223-5232
[8]   Resilience-based network component importance measures [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 117 :89-97
[9]   Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. ;
Rocco S, Claudio M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 62 :55-67
[10]   Stakeholder Perceptions of Seaport Resilience Strategies: A Case Study of Gulfport (Mississippi) and Providence (Rhode Island) [J].
Becker, Austin ;
Caldwell, Margaret R. .
COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 43 (01) :1-34