On Whether to Prefer Pain to Pass

被引:40
作者
Dougherty, Tom
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1086/658896
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Most of us are "time-biased" in preferring pains to be past rather than future and pleasures to be future rather than past. However, it turns out that if you are risk averse and time-biased, then you can be turned into a "pain pump" -in order to insure yourself against misfortune, you will take a series of pills which leaves you with more pain and better off in no respect. Since this vulnerability seems rationally impermissible, while time-bias and risk aversion seem rationally permissible, we are left with a puzzle.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 537
页数:17
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Bayesianism, infinite decisions, and binding [J].
Arntzenius, F ;
Elga, A ;
Hawthorne, J .
MIND, 2004, 113 (450) :251-283
[2]  
BUCHAK, RISK AVERSION RATION
[3]  
BUCHAK L, 2010, RISK AVERSION UNPUB
[4]   Dutch-book arguments depragmatized: Epistemic consistency for partial believers [J].
Christensen, D .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1996, 93 (09) :450-479
[5]  
DEREK P, 1984, REASONS PERSONS, P3
[6]   Disappointment, sadness, and death [J].
Draper, K .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1999, 108 (03) :387-414
[7]   RATIONALITY OF PRUDENCE [J].
KRAUT, R .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1972, 81 (03) :351-359
[8]  
MEACHAM, BINDING ITS CONSEQUE
[9]   Binding and its consequences [J].
Meacham, Christopher J. G. .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2010, 149 (01) :49-71
[10]  
PARFIT, REASONS PERSONS, P176